Kansas Crimson

Well, Raiders with a good pick tho.

twocoach wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:34 pmLOL Broncos

YES!

Jets held JJ hostage.
"We'll take him Minny unless you deal with us."

OK but like...you don't pick a QB 8th overall to sit for 3 seasons because then you have him for one to two seasons at his rookie contract.

Maybe they are trying to buck a trend?

Yea, why sign Kirk for what, 4 years and then do that?
Unless they think Kirk is going to retire and let them out of that contract???
Dunno man.

Love Odunze for the Bears though.
Keenan Allen, DJ Moore, Odunze?
Caleb is set.

PENIX!!!
ATL!!!!!!

Gotta be better than Fields and Trubisky right?

He’s top 5 for me for sure.

82. Statistically/record wise it makes sense to keep it as is. And $$ too. But in terms of resting players, I know you're all boostrapsy and i'm a man so every man should play every minute of every game but it strategically makes all the sense in the world. 82 games is just a lot. If I were a coach,...

It's been linked, and with reason, to Popovich circa 2012 and on.
It makes sense for teams who are currently comfortable in their spot and maybe playing against a lesser opponent.
It's 82 freaking games.

Bears have a lot of options.
Kind of jealous in a fresh slate kind of way but not in a actual functional football program sort of way.

Would you take this?
https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/sim/higutter-3517

( got you 2 1sts for next year )

With fewer games there'd be less likely a chance of you falling behind so many though.
That would balance out.

Instead of say 10 games back i'd be 5 and it'd mean something similar.

If we're cutting the regular season by like 40% then the games would matter quite a bit more and you wouldn't have nearly as much half ass walking down the court and lazy defending in the middle of January.

It's rampant in quarters 1 through 3 and maybe 4 if the opposing team is up by 20+.

I think that if they didn't shorten the season too much ( by days/months ) and instead had more rest days, because every game would be quite a bit more important, it'd solve a lot the load management issues. I hate to break it to you, but people don't own radio stations because they want to play mu...

What about all the CFB seasons 1990s and before?

I think that if they didn't shorten the season too much ( by days/months ) and instead had more rest days, because every game would be quite a bit more important, it'd solve a lot the load management issues.

Lost on Celts but won big on OKC last night.
OKC -7.5, over 28.5 Shai, over 1.5 3's Shai : + 480.
Shai went 3-5 from 3 and had 33 points in a blowout.

OK Chiefs don’t give up too much to move up. Explore opportunities to trade down if your guys aren’t there.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Apr 25, 2024 4:55 am when do we get our Final Four banner back too?

https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... y-returned

I’m sure soon but not long after we won’t be in the NCAA anymore and then our kids kids will laugh at those titles like we laugh at Helms.

I think it should be 5, 5, 7, 7 with no stupid play in. If I didn’t already know the allure of game 7 entrenched in me I might just say 5 all the way through. That should be enough to determine the best team ( allowing for a wtf fluke game from a worse squad ). Also the regular season should be 58-6...