Kansas Crimson

There is no question in my mind as to whether she is being truthful as to her recollections. There is obviously a mile (and, I suppose, some statutes of limitations) between that and criminal culpability or civil liability for Kavanaugh. But that's not why we're here. By far, the more important part...

Opening with some strong both-sidesing!

Silvio looks like an extra in 300.

Presumption of innocence? Due process?

You know this isn't a trial, right? You know that "not getting put onto the Supreme Court" and "getting thrown in jail" are different things, right?

Of course you do - of course you know better.

I mean, there is a Merrick Garland-shaped glass house in which there's presently a lot of rock-fighting. It is ludicrous to say there isn't a rush to confirm Kavanaugh, to "plow through" the proceedings, one might say. You cannot tell me that, were the midterms not right around the corner,...

I don't see a good path for Weber to win COY without winning a share of the Big 12. The expectations will be for KSU to finish in the top-3, so there isn't much room for Weber to exceed expectations without claiming a share. I would guess that either Self will win it (by going 16-2 or better), or so...

Like I said, I'm up for an investigation. It just has to investigate the right people. Up until last week, Ms. Ramirez couldn't even remember for sure if Brett Kavanaugh was at a party where something clearly traumatic happened to her. She admits to being blackout drunk and not remembering much els...

First of all, the last sentence is hilarious. "He's at a direct rival of Kansas." Bull. But... From that list, it would either be Hoiberg or White. I mean, I went to battle with this on .net, but I still think Bennett would be my top choice if Self leaves in the next 5 years. But we are s...

First of all, the last sentence is hilarious. "He's at a direct rival of Kansas." Bull. But... From that list, it would either be Hoiberg or White. I mean, I went to battle with this on .net, but I still think Bennett would be my top choice if Self leaves in the next 5 years. But we are s...

pdub wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:26 am I'm gonna unsticky this thread at Late Night so say your goodbyes while you can.

You know what would be helpful? A countdown.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Tue Sep 25, 2018 10:51 am No time to investigate, just confirm him ASAP! #winning

No, you have it wrong - confirm ASAP, then investigate the women.

I would bet on the field over the identified pool of five.

My problem with calling it strategy is that with Garland, they simply refused to confirm, whereas they are intentionally smearing, and, in my opinion, trying to ruin Kavanaugh. In my view, that is a huge moral difference. If only there were a way to, like, look into...evaluate...ascertain...inquire...

My problem with calling it strategy is that with Garland, they simply refused to confirm, whereas they are intentionally smearing, and, in my opinion, trying to ruin Kavanaugh. In my view, that is a huge moral difference. If only there were a way to, like, look into...evaluate...ascertain...inquire...

so why can’t this be called strategy by the libtards? and, as has been asserted, why do so many people avoid calling this credible? My problem with calling it strategy is that with Garland, they simply refused to confirm, whereas they are intentionally smearing, and, in my opinion, trying to ruin K...

Only after the polls start here.

I knew what you meant. But neither of us should pretend that Trump shares our forethought. or even has the capacity for it. Sure, but would this sequence of events really surprise you: 1. Paranoid over NYT reports, Trump instructs Kelly to ice Rosenstein while Trump is away from DC. 2. Rosenstein s...

I think he should have to give fuller and more specific explanations of his actions while in the GWB White House, and in respect of his personal finances. And both of those areas were known yellow or red flags before any of the sexual assault issues came to light.

So: what happened, then? Did the GOP just blow this one in the layoff line, then, by nominating a candidate with a bad background? I don't think we've established that he has a "bad background". It is a supposition made by people with an agenda who are unbound by the constraints of concep...

Here, then, I'll excerpt the paragraph that I omitted: Any number of grub-like Yale jurist-ghouls with diamond-edged ‘80s-dad hair and uniformly right-wing ideas about constitutional law could get confirmed to fill the Supreme Court’s vacant ninth seat, and once in that seat could be counted upon t...