Kansas Crimson

Interesting that some are so interested in "constitutionality," but only in their own interpretation of that term. Perhaps the lawyers know better than I--does the Constitution mention "lame duck presidents?" Like I said - I don’t care. The iron is hot now and I expect that it w...

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:44 pm sooo psych!

thought experiment: how would you feel about investigating if similar accusations had been levied against Merrick Garland?

(assuming he *actually* got as far as a hearing... it’s quite a thought experiment, I know)

Lame duck POTUS. Don’t care. Glad he didn’t get in, though.

I'm not the one who needs to catch on. Why are the republicans afraid of an investigation? You've seen 1st hand accounts of why people don't come out with accusations on this site. Investigate. If she's found to be lying, charger her. It’s a delay tactic, pure and simple. A waste of time and money....

TIMELINE FOR JUDGE KAVANAUGH'S ACCUSER: 1982: Something happened. 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002: She said nothing. July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeal...

The senior senator from Kentucky already did that. Why do you want a rapist on the Supreme Court? I want a conservative Constitutionalist on the Supreme Court. I want him there ASAP. No matter what. Got it. And that he's said that a sitting president should not be indited. Unless they're a Democrat...

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 10:08 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:51 pm

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:30 pm

To thwart the sitting President’s nomination, even if only for a few more days?

FYP

The senior senator from Kentucky already did that.

Why do you want a rapist on the Supreme Court?

I want a conservative Constitutionalist on the Supreme Court. I want him there ASAP.

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:30 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:28 pm

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:25 pm


But whatever you do, do NOT investigate or listen to corroborating witnesses. That would be wrong.

Again I ask - to what purpose?

To thwart the sitting President’s nomination, even if only for a few more days?

FYP

And that was the track that this thread started on. The premise that "if you didn't speak up way back when you were a kid, then it is an indication that the accusation is probably a lie". And that is why this is "apples to apples". If you want to argue the merits of whether a 55...

It was an improvement over last year, but it won’t be enough to save Beaty’s job.

jgmaine wrote: ↑Tue Aug 21, 2018 8:43 pmthat's all.

Remind me how many deaths he is responsible for again?

Back on track. She is a female, she is obviously lying. And that was the track that this thread started on. The premise that "if you didn't speak up way back when you were a kid, then it is an indication that the accusation is probably a lie". And that is why this is "apples to apple...

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:53 pm Nearly 9 million votes were cast for someone other than Trump.

And how much does that matter?
Hint: It is spelled the same as “zero”

jhawks99 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:41 pm

HouseDivided wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:23 pm

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:08 pm You preferred a crime family.

I prefer anything to her, and apparently I’m not alone.

You're right. The Russians preferred trump too.

What can I say? They have better taste than 49% of Americans.

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 12:08 pm You preferred a crime family.

I prefer anything to her, and apparently I’m not alone.

Geezer wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:34 am https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-AAAo3i3

Yup. It couldn’t just be that people find Hillary so objectionable that they shut her down. Russians are much more plausible.

Ha, sorry psych, my last post was kinda harsh. Beaverfever is dog sitting this neurotic boxer, and it’s been running around and jumping all over and barking at everything all morning, and it’s got me kind of...well, irritated. Hey maybe he’d make a good president! Jk lol But for real, there’s no ne...

meaning? you said it yourself bro. You think it's "accomplishing something" just to irritate everybody. HouseDivided, just realize how divisive you are. you seem to have no interest in actual dialogue, you hardly offer any constructive ideas, and you couldn't care less about the perspecti...

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 9:09 am still taking a side, and intentionally choosing the irritating side, K

Meaning?

I wonder the same about people over 30 who are obsessed with a) comic books, b) superheroes, c) video games, and/or d) cosplay. Makes no sense to me. Ditto Doesn't make sense to you guys? Fair enough. Heck, I don't really get the things you listed either (and I fully admit I didn't even know what &...

lobster wrote: ↑Sat Sep 22, 2018 1:16 am Makes me laugh that people still are choosing sides. Wake and see the whole thing is shit.

There’s a lot of truth to that. It’s mostly why I like Trump: he irritates both “sides” of the establishment, which means he actually has a chance of accomplishing something.