False, that if KU thought he did nothing wrong then he'd be playing. That isn't the only thing KU has to consider.IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Dec 14, 2018 12:05 pm It matters what KU believed happened too. We are uncomfortable enough that we are voluntarily holding him out.
And for the 10th time ( )...this isn't a court of law... the ncaa doesn't need to "prove beyond a reasonable doubt" that improper benefits happened.
Why are we doing this? We all know what most likely happened. Many of us have suspected this has been going on for decades. Most of us don't give a shit that it's happening and is widespread.
If KU thought/knew that SDS had done nothing wrong then he'd be playing.
If KU thought/knew that there wouldn't be ANY evidence possibly discovered that would implicate the player or program then he'd be playing (probably why Duke is playing Zion, they know there won't be a paper trail, and they won't show up on texts or phone calls).
Be mad at the ncaa for the rules they've created....that's what has caused this.
They have to take into account how erratic and inconsistent that the ncaa is in cases like this.
As you stated, it doesnt have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The ncaa is proving now that they can just threaten without proving anything at all to remove a player from ncaa competition.