Dumbfuck in charge

[Deleted User 75]

Wasn't trying to be a smart ass at all.

[twocoach]

i was more referring to fave-to-face bullying, by peers and classmates...vs being bullied on social media

not even considering actual physical bullying, which is a whole different can of worms

Look at this place. It's a prime example of what kids face. We are all WAY nastier to each other here than we ever would be face to face. And kids have jello pudding between their ears.

i can honestly say i’m not. i don’t say anything on here that i wouldn’t say to someone’s face

And there are a few others who are probably in the same boat. So we arent ALL. Just many. My bad.

[twocoach]

Wasn't trying to be a smart ass at all.

Then I will take a closer look at that link at some point to see what it is.

[Deleted User 62]

Anyone want some of what Rudy is smoking?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... spartandhp

[defixione]

So it's come down to "They're not God, after all. They could be wrong" as a basis of defense for Trump's legal team?

Unbelievable.

I still think it's funny that no one in Trump's camp will allow him to be questioned on his own cuz he can't tell the truth.

[seahawk]

Would think that cyberbullying and in person bullying may be separate categories for those who publish social science research, but not necessarily for mean kids who could use both to damage their classmates. It only takes one high antisocial kid to wreak major havoc in another teen's life.

[Deleted User 62]

So it's come down to "They're not God, after all. They could be wrong" as a basis of defense for Trump's legal team?

Unbelievable.

I still think it's funny that no one in Trump's camp will allow him to be questioned on his own cuz he can't tell the truth.

I wonder if it Rudy's job to just spout completely ridiculous crap so that Donny John looks somewhat intelligent?

[Deleted User 89]

truth isn’t truth

[Deleted User 89]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... dfe356fb16

[Deleted User 89]

nothing like quoting pat buchanon to prove you aren’t racist

https://www.vox.com/2019/1/14/18181897/ ... lumn-tweet

[Deleted User 183]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... 59f0d85c1d

[Geezer]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics ... index.html

LOL

[Deleted User 89]

he can make it from the oval office if he wants...

[Deleted User 75]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics ... index.html

LOL

LOL for sure.

Guess we know this means it'll be from the Oval Office. There will be good basketball on anyway so I'll do the cliff notes version.

[twocoach]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics ... index.html

LOL

That's freaking hilarious. What a boss move by Pelosi. Trump has to be livid.

[Geezer]

https://twitter.com/RepJeffries/status/ ... 2134553600

[zsn]

he can make it from the oval office if he wants...

Isn't there some Constitutional requirement that it be "delivered to Congress"? If it is from the Oval Office, it may not be allowed to be called SOTU. Also, IIRC, it doesn't have to be exactly in January and doesn't also have to be delivered in person. Could just be a written document, like Nancy says he could do. Boss move, indeed.

[Deleted User 75]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics ... index.html

LOL

Trump has to be livid.

I thought the exact opposite. Now he won't have to face the embarrassment of having many members of congress not stand and clap ritualistically after all of his grand declarations.

This is probably a net positive for trump if he elects to give it from the Oval Office instead.

[Deleted User 62]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/16/politics ... index.html

LOL

Trump has to be livid.

I thought the exact opposite. Now he won't have to face the embarrassment of having many members of congress not stand and clap ritualistically after all of his grand declarations.

This is probably a net positive for trump if he elects to give it from the Oval Office instead.

Also, he can use that time to tell us about the roving band of raping murderers carrying heroin across through the desert.

[twocoach]

he can make it from the oval office if he wants...

Isn't there some Constitutional requirement that it be "delivered to Congress"? If it is from the Oval Office, it may not be allowed to be called SOTU. Also, IIRC, it doesn't have to be exactly in January and doesn't also have to be delivered in person. Could just be a written document, like Nancy says he could do. Boss move, indeed.

"He shall from time to time give to Congress information of the State of the Union and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient."

He could deliver it in June from the toilet during his morning bowel movement like he does the rest of his policy decisions if he chose to.