I wonder what the NFLPA's view on emergency quarterbacks is. Generally, players' unions are in favor of more roster spots for obvious reasons. But, the same reasons players' unions don't want big practice squads would seem to apply here (namely, that a team locking up an "emergency" quarterback might keep that guy from jumping into a better situation when it opens up).CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:20 pm I know most here won't care at all, which is entirely understandable when your team wins, but the NFL did not cover itself in glory yesterday, which is often the best day of the year in the NFL.
You had the 4 best teams playing in a semifinal and the first game was an absolute snoozefest and the second game was filled with bad play and bad officiating. Most of the national headlines I am seeing today are about officiating and blown plays and not the actual games.
NFL needs to tweak for the audience again. So little game action over 4 hours.
I suspect you'll see something on this over the offseason - I agree that it's bad business (not to mention dangerous) for a team to essentially play without a quarterback.