Vivek ramaswamy
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Why do you consider that share-worthy?
I don't think there was anything brave (or notable) about Biden's podcast. (if you need a good cringe, give it a listen, if they're still around somewhere)
I don't think there was anything brave (or notable) about Biden's podcast. (if you need a good cringe, give it a listen, if they're still around somewhere)
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12111
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Here we go kids, every time Vivek posts something on social media randy is going to pull an Elmo - and then post it on here.
randylahey wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:33 pm
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13432
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
does anyone other than randy sit around and think, i need to listen to politicians listen to themselves talk?
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
In fairness I don't think randy thinks at all. I think he just predictably reacts to stimuli, like a chemotactic bacterium.KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:16 pm does anyone other than randy sit around and think, i need to listen to politicians listen to themselves talk?
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 13432
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
lol
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
I don't see him actually listening to it; more just waiting for the edited clips he can parrot.KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:16 pm does anyone other than randy sit around and think, i need to listen to politicians listen to themselves talk?
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Thanks for sending me to Google.PhDhawk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:38 pmIn fairness I don't think randy thinks at all. I think he just predictably reacts to stimuli, like a chemotactic bacterium.KUTradition wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2023 4:16 pm does anyone other than randy sit around and think, i need to listen to politicians listen to themselves talk?
Defense. Rebounds.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 5855
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
That Randy is most likely Lobsters cousin that the family refers to as “slow”?
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12111
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
No. What is "it"?
That Lobster or whoever it was that believed YouTube views (popularity) are an ultimate indicator on a candidates chance/s of becoming President and because of it felt Tulsi and Yang had an excellent chance to win the Democratic nomination - would imply Vivek has a fantastic chance to become President based on randy's sharing of Vivek's social media shit?
That randy is a troll and/or after being called out doesn't come back with any semi intelligent dialogue?
That Vivek is a Republican (or Democratic) plant and the Russians and Chinese are in on it?
(That one was in honor of randy and his conspiracy theories)
randylahey wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:33 pm
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
-
- Posts: 8804
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Weren't you the one that just tried to tell us Gradey dick thanking God was "extremely dangerous"RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 4:35 amNo. What is "it"?
That Lobster or whoever it was that believed YouTube views (popularity) are an ultimate indicator on a candidates chance/s of becoming President and because of it felt Tulsi and Yang had an excellent chance to win the Democratic nomination - would imply Vivek has a fantastic chance to become President based on randy's sharing of Vivek's social media shit?
That randy is a troll and/or after being called out doesn't come back with any semi intelligent dialogue?
That Vivek is a Republican (or Democratic) plant and the Russians and Chinese are in on it?
(That one was in honor of randy and his conspiracy theories)
-
- Posts: 8804
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
And to be clear I think vivek has a very poor chance to win. But hes the kind of candidate we need. He isn't a career politician so he isn't just in it for the money and power. He genuinely has common sense ideas with the sole purpose of solving problems in this country. He has an honest approach and doesn't want to play identity politics and the politically correct deception game
-
- Posts: 8804
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Here's a polite challenge. Some of you are dismissing vivek simply because I, a non leftist, has voiced some support for him. Show us a better candidate for 2024
(Obviously ain't biden or Trump)
(Obviously ain't biden or Trump)
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
i will vote for the wastepaperbasket before i vote for uncle joe or dt.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 12111
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Perhaps I did but I don't recall saying that.randylahey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:36 amWeren't you the one that just tried to tell us Gradey dick thanking God was "extremely dangerous"RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Apr 04, 2023 4:35 amNo. What is "it"?
That Lobster or whoever it was that believed YouTube views (popularity) are an ultimate indicator on a candidates chance/s of becoming President and because of it felt Tulsi and Yang had an excellent chance to win the Democratic nomination - would imply Vivek has a fantastic chance to become President based on randy's sharing of Vivek's social media shit?
That randy is a troll and/or after being called out doesn't come back with any semi intelligent dialogue?
That Vivek is a Republican (or Democratic) plant and the Russians and Chinese are in on it?
(That one was in honor of randy and his conspiracy theories)
I believe I said, nothing in regards to him THANKING God. I think I said him saying, "with God anything is possible" - "can be a dangerous message to send".
Being that you quoted me as saying Gradey Dick thanking God was "extremely dangerous" I must have. If you can provide proof of my saying that - please do.
randylahey wrote: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:33 pm
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
Rainbows I'm sorry you have nothing better to do than to go digging stuff up on a message board.
-
- Posts: 8804
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Youre a never ending facepalm. Yes it was the with "God anything is possible" part you were butthurt about. But for fucks sake use some context and common sense
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 5855
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:12 pm
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
Holy fuck
“By way of contrast, I'm not the one who feels the need to respond to every post someone else makes”
Psych- Every Single Time
Psych- Every Single Time
Re: Vivek ramaswamy
i don't know how to pronounce his name. but the more i read about him, the more i might like.