Vivek ramaswamy

[JKLivin]

rare exceptions?

What names have I called you? What attempts have I made to make you angry via personal attacks? What instances of me following you across forums posting provocation are you citing? I have responded to your "lol" responses in kind, but I doubt you lost any sleep over it.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Watching Psych's personal growth has been one of the most rewarding experiences about joining .com, Kcrim, et al.

Ok, I'll admit that reading "Psych's" and "personal growth" in the same sentence gave me the heebie jeebies.

You're absolutely entitled to your opinion, but I would argue - and I think that my post content over the past year supports this (with rare exceptions) - that I have consistently been one of the few around here to try and act like an adult.

I'm not name-calling, gaslighting, or attempting to provoke others, and I've used the tools available to avoid those who are. It's one thing to say you don't agree with or like my views; it is quite another to contend that I am being an ass to my fellow bored members.

I'm not sure why that concept is so difficult for some folks, but it is what it is. I have better things to do than get into Internet bored fights.

I respect your post but I'm not sure why it was in response to mine.
My post was an attempt at crude humor. As usual, seems I may have failed at my attempt.

[randylahey]

Lol.

The cowardly racist blocked me too.

What's the point of getting on a small message board then blocking half the people lol

[JKLivin]

Ok, I'll admit that reading "Psych's" and "personal growth" in the same sentence gave me the heebie jeebies.

You're absolutely entitled to your opinion, but I would argue - and I think that my post content over the past year supports this (with rare exceptions) - that I have consistently been one of the few around here to try and act like an adult.

I'm not name-calling, gaslighting, or attempting to provoke others, and I've used the tools available to avoid those who are. It's one thing to say you don't agree with or like my views; it is quite another to contend that I am being an ass to my fellow bored members.

I'm not sure why that concept is so difficult for some folks, but it is what it is. I have better things to do than get into Internet bored fights.

I respect your post but I'm not sure why it was in response to mine.
My post was an attempt at crude humor. As usual, seems I may have failed at my attempt.

My bad. I interpreted it as serious. Please accept my apology.

[MICHHAWK]

of the 13 active members. 10 or so, just belch out the same pig vomit post after post after post. so in theory, one could block 6 or 7. leaving 3 or 4. and you would not miss a thing.

[JKLivin]

of the 13 active members. 10 or so, just belch out the same pig vomit post after post after post. so in theory, one could block 6 or 7. leaving 3 or 4. and you would not miss a thing.

I've got three on IGNORE and would like to avoid adding others, but it gets tempting. The childish behavior gets really old

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

of the 13 active members. 10 or so, just belch out the same pig vomit post after post after post. so in theory, one could block 6 or 7. leaving 3 or 4. and you would not miss a thing.

Block this!

[jhawks99]

Lol.

The cowardly racist blocked me too.

What's the point of getting on a small message board then blocking half the people lol

Ask your buddy psych

[MICHHAWK]

i wouldn't call it "blocking." it would be more like "downsizing." or "streamlining."

it's like, what's the diff between 10 pennies or 2 nickels.

[Sparko]

The beautiful thing about Mich blocking people who happen to be right and reasonable is that Mich is owned by post after post and everyone but Mich sees it. I am sure the paranoia will cause secret unblockings. Because down-sizing means the opposite of what he thought. Let's all leap in.

[JKLivin]

i wouldn't call it "blocking." it would be more like "downsizing." or "streamlining."

it's like, what's the diff between 10 pennies or 2 nickels.

It’s minimizing dumbassery.

[Sparko]

No. It is exposing it. Post after post to the unseeing.

[JKLivin]

No. It is exposing it. Post after post to the unseeing.

There’s a difference between disagreeing amiably and being verbally harassing and abusive. The former is being an adult on a message bored; the latter is blatant dumbassery.

[Sparko]

Mich and Randy swing that way though.

[Overlander]

Mich and Randy swing that way though.

Keep it up, Psych will Hong Kong Fuey your ass!

[Sparko]

I am thinking he sees nothing like Sgt Schultz in Stalag Luft Politiks Geborden

[JKLivin]

Mich and Randy swing that way though.

They’re not that bad. They upset people because they have different ideas and beliefs. They are not abusive and they don’t harass anyone. You may disagree with them, but they’re not being childish idiots. There’s a difference.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Moving back to Vivek.....
I mean Obama.
I mean Vivek.

https://twitter.com/RpsAgainstTrump/sta ... 5353687363

[KUTradition]

Mich and Randy swing that way though.

They’re not that bad. They upset people because they have different ideas and beliefs. They are not abusive and they don’t harass anyone. You may disagree with them, but they’re not being childish idiots. There’s a difference.

it has zero to do with them having different opinions

it’s that, specifically (imo), the opinions they trumpet don’t square with reality

but, that seems to be your m.o. as well, so it’s not surprising that you’d make excuses for, and attempt to defend them

[jfish26]

Mich and Randy swing that way though.

They’re not that bad. They upset people because they have different ideas and beliefs. They are not abusive and they don’t harass anyone. You may disagree with them, but they’re not being childish idiots. There’s a difference.

it has zero to do with them having different opinions

it’s that, specifically (imo), the opinions they trumpet don’t square with reality

but, that seems to be your m.o. as well, so it’s not surprising that you’d make excuses for, and attempt to defend them

Pretty much this.

Fundamentally, MICH's opinions and Randy's share the same fundamental problem: MICH and Randy generally do not support their opinions with facts.