That was meant for Mich.
I tend to think that guys like Joel and...well...ummm...Wilt do more for KU as MVPs than they could ever have done in the tournament.
But then, Mich eats crayons.
That was meant for Mich.
Fair, but then you're not an immigrant from the poorest continent on earth w/the potential to create generational wealth, not to mention fame, if you can avoid hurting yourself any further.
Do you really think that a minor dip in his shooting percentage due to fighting through a knee injury to try to achieve his and his team's goals would be a seven-figure risk?jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 12:49 pmI think it's complicated.
What is fair to expect of someone in this situation, where the short-term risk is measured in seven figures, and the medium- and long-term one potentially eight?
If your answer is that we shouldn't want guys with pro aspirations playing college basketball at all...I'm not looking to reopen that front, and so I'll let my prior opinions speak for themselves on that. Truly not looking to refight old and worn battles.
But what should be expected of anyone - any of us, even - in a situation where what's at stake is this significant?
Ok.
But that's what I'm saying - I think his true talent level is much closer to 22-23 than it is to pre-injury 23-24, and that talk of him as a first rounder was quite reliant on shooting figures that were probably a mirage in the first place.twocoach wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 1:37 pmDo you really think that a minor dip in his shooting percentage due to fighting through a knee injury to try to achieve his and his team's goals would be a seven-figure risk?jfish26 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 12:49 pmI think it's complicated.
What is fair to expect of someone in this situation, where the short-term risk is measured in seven figures, and the medium- and long-term one potentially eight?
If your answer is that we shouldn't want guys with pro aspirations playing college basketball at all...I'm not looking to reopen that front, and so I'll let my prior opinions speak for themselves on that. Truly not looking to refight old and worn battles.
But what should be expected of anyone - any of us, even - in a situation where what's at stake is this significant?
No one seriously believes that do they?
We weren't beating Gonzaga. It took one of our best shooting halves of the season to stay in it with them in the 1st
A better chance, yeah. But it wouldn't have changed their game plan against us one bit. They thrived off of dickinsons inability to guard pick and rolls, that doesn't change because mccullar is out there. In fact we might have been worse offensively with him out there at 80 percent. His shooting wad horrible post injury
The question is whether or not he would have been risking his health and his future. I think you would be hard pressed to find a doctor who would state that either of those things were at risk.randylahey wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:17 pm The idea that mccullar is a bad teammate for not risking his health/future to try to help KU win some tournament games is wild.
We all know this KU team was a Longshot even with him healthy
Any fan making mccullar out to be a bad teammate is the one that's actually selfish. Yeah it sucks he had an injury. But mccullar was a hard worker in his time at KU, who's game pretty much embodied team first. He was a very willing passer and one of the best defenders self has ever had here
I certainly agree with this, in terms of his physical ability.pdub wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:59 pm A bone bruise could have a slight chance of leading to a fracture.
But he had been playing on it all the way up to that point and, if you're going to listen to what Self said, the doctors said nothing had gotten worse.
So I lean with twocoach here -- I think the risk of something long term was extremely minimal.