Page 506 of 530
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 12:55 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
StayCurious wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 11:04 am
There's a really easy way they could prove their story. All they would have to do is release the video footage from Pelosi's home. But that will never happen, as I'm sure the cameras "stopped working" during the crime.
So you know for sure that he has cameras INside his home?
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 12:57 pm
by ousdahl
psych knows for sure...who do you think was holding the camera?
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:01 pm
by StayCurious
Never known of any family that rich that did not have cameras in and outside their home, and the police already verified they do have footage.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:17 pm
by MICHHAWK
san fran is a sanctuary city. no doubt they released the suspect. gave him a coupon book. made him promise to appear in a few years from now when his case # is called.
no bond. because that would be. wrong.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:52 pm
by twocoach
Keep in mind your prime "source" for what you believe about the Pelosi case is a website that in 2016 reported that Hillary Clinton was actually dead and had a body double stand in for her in a presidential debate.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:54 pm
by twocoach
MICHHAWK wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:17 pm
san fran is a sanctuary city. no doubt they released the suspect. gave him a coupon book. made him promise to appear in a few years from now when his case # is called.
no bond. because that would be. wrong.
DePape is facing federal charges but cool story.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:19 pm
by Mjl
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 11:20 am
intellectual honesty at its finest
welcome back lobs/walrus/squiddy
I think it's psych
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 7:30 pm
by RainbowsandUnicorns
StayCurious wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:01 pm
Never known of any family that rich that did not have cameras in and outside their home, and the police already verified they do have footage.
I know families with a lot more money than him and they don't have cameras inside their homes.
Police verified they have footage of what? Their body cam footage? Yes. Footage outside the house? Yes. Where have you seen/heard/read the police state they had video footage from house cameras inside the house? My guess is you didn't. Prove me wrong.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:34 am
by KUTradition
Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 5:19 pm
KUTradition wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 11:20 am
intellectual honesty at its finest
welcome back lobs/walrus/squiddy
I think it's psych
that was my initial thinking
some recent syntax has me on the fence
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:40 am
by TDub
I was initially pretty sure it wasn't lobs......now I'd probably guess it is.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:55 am
by MICHHAWK
fingers crossed it's the lobster.
the lobster was always very respectful. this world needs more respectful.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 11:10 am
by KUTradition
‘Release the video’ is mostly a way to extend the conspiracy theory
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... -theories/
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 11:30 am
by StayCurious
If your wife was Nancy, wouldn't you be looking for something else? I think most men would rather be with that man than her. Makes sense.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 11:42 am
by KUTradition
…An initial trigger is often early, unclear information about what occurred. We see this frequently, from the attack on Paul Pelosi to claims that the 2020 election was stolen to conspiracy theories about the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. In each case, things that seemed like they might be one way were shown to be something else, generally as new information is gathered. This is how learning works. But because early indicators are often wrong, they are later dismissed by authorities — and therefore become looped into conspiracies.
…
The lure of conspiracy is too strong to accept that, however, and the public understanding of how logic works is too weak...
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 11:52 am
by StayCurious
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 7:30 pm
StayCurious wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 1:01 pm
Never known of any family that rich that did not have cameras in and outside their home, and the police already verified they do have footage.
I know families with a lot more money than him and they don't have cameras inside their homes.
Police verified they have footage of what? Their body cam footage? Yes. Footage outside the house? Yes. Where have you seen/heard/read the police state they had video footage from house cameras inside the house? My guess is you didn't. Prove me wrong.
Well, okay.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:01 pm
by KUTradition
poor lobs
still trying so hard
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm
by digitalkookie
Of course it is surrounded by surveillance cameras...OUTSIDE the house.
Why do I waste my time?
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:19 pm
by StayCurious
digitalkookie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm
Of course it is surrounded by surveillance cameras...OUTSIDE the house.
Why do I waste my time?
The outside cameras would be able to determine if he was invited in.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:31 pm
by digitalkookie
StayCurious wrote: ↑Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:19 pm
digitalkookie wrote: ↑Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm
Of course it is surrounded by surveillance cameras...OUTSIDE the house.
Why do I waste my time?
The outside cameras would be able to determine if he was invited in.
The issue Gutter raised was the presence of cameras inside the house...
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:38 pm
by StayCurious
Well, it's just the outside cameras that matter in this case.