Kansas Crimson

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 11:50 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:09 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 9:20 am

So, because it was a racial issue that touched off the riots, anyone who tried to defend private property being destroyed is racist? That’s a pretty big leap in logic.

As to your second question, I have no evidence to tell me that he wasn’t, other than the fact that he wasn’t targeting people of color, nor do I have evidence that he was. Neither do you. So, why jump to negative, unwarranted conclusions?

The notion that this had anything to do with defending private property is absurd. Give it a break.

And you know this how? Are you a mind reader? Or are you just pushing assumptions that give weight to your prejudices?

Never mind, I already know the answer. (See how that works?)

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:22 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:41 pm

defixione wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:19 pm That's because of your pseudo science.

It’s worked out pretty well for me. I have no complaints.

your family says hi

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:48 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 11:50 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 10:09 am

The notion that this had anything to do with defending private property is absurd. Give it a break.

And you know this how? Are you a mind reader? Or are you just pushing assumptions that give weight to your prejudices?

Never mind, I already know the answer. (See how that works?)

Based on the different recorded statements by Rittenhouse himself prior to going to Kenosha that have been published.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:48 am New angle!

I’m sure psych is eager to discuss this one

https://twitter.com/brieloskota/status/ ... 49539?s=21

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 10:27 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:48 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 11:50 am

And you know this how? Are you a mind reader? Or are you just pushing assumptions that give weight to your prejudices?

Never mind, I already know the answer. (See how that works?)

Based on the different recorded statements by Rittenhouse himself prior to going to Kenosha that have been published.

And yet, despite your certainty, he is acquitted and a free man. Thank goodness our legal system doesn’t rely on one person’s perceptions.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 3:52 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 10:27 am

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:48 am

Based on the different recorded statements by Rittenhouse himself prior to going to Kenosha that have been published.

And yet, despite your certainty, he is acquitted and a free man. Thank goodness our legal system doesn’t rely on one person’s perceptions.

Or his intentions had nothing to do with the charges he faced.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:29 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 3:52 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 10:27 am

And yet, despite your certainty, he is acquitted and a free man. Thank goodness our legal system doesn’t rely on one person’s perceptions.

Or his intentions had nothing to do with the charges he faced.

What were his intentions?

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:18 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:29 pm

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 3:52 pm
Or his intentions had nothing to do with the charges he faced.

What were his intentions?

I don't think he even really knows. I mean, he did lie after all. Right?

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:29 pm

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:18 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:29 pm

What were his intentions?

I don't think he even really knows. I mean, he did lie after all. Right?

Well, my pseudo scientific training stopped short of mind reading, so I’d have to go with his sworn testimony in court, which seemed pretty reliable to my dim witted, poorly-educated self.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:29 pm

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 7:18 pm

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 6:29 pm

What were his intentions?

I don't think he even really knows. I mean, he did lie after all. Right?

Well, my pseudo scientific training stopped short of mind reading, so I’d have to go with his sworn testimony in court, which seemed pretty reliable to my dim witted, poorly-educated self.

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 10:25 am

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Sun Nov 21, 2021 8:22 am

JKLivin wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 8:41 pm

It’s worked out pretty well for me. I have no complaints.

your family says hi

My family’s great. Thanks for asking.

Defense attorney Kevin Gough, who represents Bryan, told jurors his client was guided by "divine providence" to capture video of Arbery on the street that day, saying Bryan acted as a well-meaning witness to the killing...

"Something is guiding Mr. Bryan down this street to document what’s going on," Gough said. "He’s being guided, whether that’s by a god, if you believe in God, or some other entity. But do you really believe it’s just coincidence or chance?"

michhawk wrote:we’re the greatest country on earth, can do no wrong, and the water in michigan is the best in the planet