Page 2 of 79
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:24 pm
by Deleted User 307
God, those numbers are bad. So to use her numbers, .04% of folks died from H1N1. Meaning Covid-19 is 50x deadlier. Also, using her 7,500 deaths per day, that means that at the very least, 1% of deaths in the US are because of Covid-19 right now. And this thing is just starting.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:34 pm
by zsn
Vega wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:24 pm
God, those numbers are bad. So to use her numbers, .04% of folks died from H1N1. Meaning Covid-19 is 50x deadlier. Also, using her 7,500 deaths per day, that means that at the very least, 1% of deaths in the US are because of Covid-19 right now. And this thing is just starting.
Stop trying to make sense!
Also realize you are "arguing" with people who fit the adage "It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than open one's mouth and remove all doubt"
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:37 pm
by HouseDivided
Whoa! Gutter with the racist AND misogynist take all in one post.
Strong work, sir!
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:40 pm
by Deleted User 307
God, Psych is hard work.
Unrelated, gotta really feel for the service industry right now.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:52 pm
by Deleted User 289
^^^^^^
"I just think these numbers right now are not relevant". Mnuchin.
Fucking cunt.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:57 pm
by Shirley
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:57 pm
by Geezer
close to 11,000 new cases and 116 dead so far today
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:04 pm
by HouseDivided
Vega wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:40 pm
God, Psych is hard work.
Unrelated, gotta really feel for the service industry right now.
Damn you, Trump!
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:41 pm
by DCHawk1
zsn wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:34 pm
Vega wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:24 pm
God, those numbers are bad. So to use her numbers, .04% of folks died from H1N1. Meaning Covid-19 is 50x deadlier. Also, using her 7,500 deaths per day, that means that at the very least, 1% of deaths in the US are because of Covid-19 right now. And this thing is just starting.
Stop trying to make sense!
Also realize you are "arguing" with people who fit the adage "It's better to remain silent and be thought a fool than open one's mouth and remove all doubt"
He's not arguing with anyone.
Neither Candace Owens nor Rudy Giuliani posts here (as far as I know).
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 2:42 pm
by DCHawk1
Feral wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 1:57 pm
Good God.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 3:03 pm
by chiknbut
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:07 pm
by Deleted User 307
Coronavirus Live Updates: U.S. Now Has More Cases Than Any Other Country
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/worl ... e=Homepage
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:59 pm
by HouseDivided
You are assuming that China actually reported real numbers. I am dubious about that.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:09 pm
by DCHawk1
Several things are true, all at the same time.
China is hiding new cases. China hid cases in the initial outbreak. China hid deaths. We have a shitload of cases. There will be more -- many, many more. Even so, on a per capita basis, we're not as bad off it seems.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:12 pm
by Deleted User 307
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:59 pm
You are assuming that China actually reported real numbers. I am dubious about that.
You are assuming the US reported real numbers. I am dubious about that
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:14 pm
by Deleted User 141
Probably no one doubts that China has suppressed numbers. Had they reported correctly, our government would have better prepared for the inevitable spread to the US, right, because our experts only respond to the actual numbers China reports.
Fuck that deflection nonsense.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pm
by Geezer
Everybody forgets the words, assume and assumption.
China hid what number?
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pm
by Deleted User 89
Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:14 pm
Probably no one doubts that China has suppressed numbers.
Had they reported correctly, our government would have better prepared for the inevitable spread to the US, right, because our experts only respond to the actual numbers China reports.
Fuck that deflection nonsense.
the bolded is utter bs
“we” got caught with our pants down, period
we were never going to be prepared, and still aren’t even though the reality is right in front of us
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:49 pm
by HouseDivided
Vega wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:12 pm
HouseDivided wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:59 pm
You are assuming that China actually reported real numbers. I am dubious about that.
You are assuming the US reported real numbers. I am dubious about that
We are in agreement about the reliability of the numbers.
Re: COVID-19 numbers
Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 6:27 pm
by Deleted User 141
TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:31 pm
Gqcolorado wrote: ↑Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:14 pm
Probably no one doubts that China has suppressed numbers.
Had they reported correctly, our government would have better prepared for the inevitable spread to the US, right, because our experts only respond to the actual numbers China reports.
Fuck that deflection nonsense.
the bolded is utter bs
“we” got caught with our pants down, period
we were never going to be prepared, and still aren’t even though the reality is right in front of us
agree. the (,right,) was suppose to indicate what your reply said.