Chefs

Kansas Football.
Deleted User 318

Re: Chefs

Post by Deleted User 318 »

jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:04 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 8:36 pm https://ftw.usatoday.com/2020/09/chiefs ... t-of-unity

Chiefs fans causing drama already. Bad look. Probably mostly Missouri residents.
I heard that. Was trying to be in denial. A-holes.
Yeah, so uncalled for. If you don’t agree with the players fighting for equality, then don’t pay for tickets, or keep your mouths shut for 1 minute. It’s a bad look. If I were a player, I’d call out the fans for that.
User avatar
KU76erfan
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:08 am

Re: Chefs

Post by KU76erfan »

Not nice.
"Having T-Shirt tmcats as a KSU fan has to be embarrassing for some. He should just stay on the tiggerboard where the little weasel best fits in."
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19050
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Chefs

Post by twocoach »

Man, this KC defense has had some problems simply tackling and have still been excellent. They are going to be nasty come playoff time.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

Watson missing Nuk.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 15943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Chefs

Post by jhawks99 »

Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:27 pm
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:22 pm Sammy Watkins > T Hill
Lay off the moonshine
If I had to chooose one to keep, it would be Sammy. I think he's more reliable.
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

Errr.
What Cascadia said.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 15943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Chefs

Post by jhawks99 »

Refs feeling sorry for the texans? letting them get away with a false start
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 15943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Chefs

Post by jhawks99 »

pdub wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:54 pm Errr.
What Cascadia said.
Don't make me go illy on you
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Chefs

Post by Cascadia »

Hill is a Top 5 WR is the NFL. Watkins gets more looks because Hill is double teamed on every play. When he’s not double teamed, he’s busting off 50-60 yards TD’s
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:59 pm Refs feeling sorry for the texans? letting them get away with a false start
Pretty blatant.
Maybe itll make Mahomes need to score again.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 19050
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Chefs

Post by twocoach »

jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:53 pm
Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:27 pm
jhawks99 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 9:22 pm Sammy Watkins > T Hill
Lay off the moonshine
If I had to chooose one to keep, it would be Sammy. I think he's more reliable.
Because he will never need to be covered by more than one defender.

Hill is a game changer. Him just being out there demands the full attention of the entire defensive backfield. They are all doing what they are doing based on where Hill is and goes. Watkins over Hill is crazy talk.

Hill is a match-up problem against every defender on the field. Watins is only a match-up problem against the 3rd-6th defender on the opposition, which makes him a great player in the role that he fills for the Chiefs. Put him in Hill's role and this Chiefs offense isn't as good.

It's OK to be a really good WR2. That's Watkins ceiling and he'll make generational wealth to go along with a very happy and successful athlete being that.
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 15943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Chefs

Post by jhawks99 »

Heckuva run
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

CEH not a goalline back.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

Good win against a playoff caliber team. Rookies looked good.
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: Chefs

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Chefs

Post by Cascadia »

NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:24 pm Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.
Agreed
User avatar
jhawks99
Contributor
Posts: 15943
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:34 am
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Chefs

Post by jhawks99 »

pdub wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:16 pm CEH not a goalline back.
Yeah, he may be a little small for that.
Defense. Rebounds.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33240
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Chefs

Post by pdub »

I know Reid is trying to reward CEH for getting them there but ( and this is putting fantasy football aside ) Anthony Sherman might be a guy you put in at 2nd and goal on the one.
Deleted User 318

Re: Chefs

Post by Deleted User 318 »

Sausage has one running TD in nine seasons. D. Williams is your 3rd and goal back.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 16117
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Chefs

Post by jfish26 »

Cascadia wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:32 pm
NewtonHawk11 wrote: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:24 pm Chiefs scored 34. Didn’t try for basically 2 quarters and still easily smacked a top 5 AFC team. Mahomes look in control. They ran the ball very well.

Defense was a welcome start. Front 7 looks good. Secondary played well. Bit banged up and a suspension to deal with.

But overall, couldn’t ask for a better start.
Agreed
Because I look at these things from a very particular (and shared) lens, this team has the look of some of Bill's scariest KU offenses (2010-11 and 2017-18 come to mind). There's just problems everywhere, and because of that, they make shredding decent-to-good teams look routine.
Post Reply