good point
Joe Rogan
Re: Joe Rogan
But it isn't just like the unvaxxed. It's still at a significantly lower rate.
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Joe Rogan
I shouldn't have even dipped into this thread. You know a great discussion about 1st Amendment rights is going to come in a discussion about Joe Rogan and (I presume) Spotify.Cascadia wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:19 pmPlease, no facts here.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:16 pm Dammit, no. The "fire in a crowded theatre" quip is not the law. It is very old dicta that has never been the law.
Re: Joe Rogan
It doesn't qualify as disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace?CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:16 pm Dammit, no. The "fire in a crowded theatre" quip is not the law. It is very old dicta that has never been the law.
- CrimsonNBlue
- Posts: 17405
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am
Re: Joe Rogan
The context was 1st Amendment, which is about inciting violence through speech. "Fire in a crowded theatre" has never been the law.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:31 pmIt doesn't qualify as disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace?CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:16 pm Dammit, no. The "fire in a crowded theatre" quip is not the law. It is very old dicta that has never been the law.
The answer to your question would depend on the specific state law and, of course, the facts of the situation.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 9489
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am
Re: Joe Rogan
Depending on who/what you believe, there are people who are unvaccinated and taking up hospital beds (and have the need for doctors and nurses to treat them that could be attending to other people in need) - because they are unvaccinated.
If that's true, you don't think that "endangers" them and/or others?
Decent chance my bro-in-law would still be alive today and treating what killed him if that wasn't the case.
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:48 am
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
Re: Joe Rogan
I stand corrected then.CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:39 pmThe context was 1st Amendment, which is about inciting violence through speech. "Fire in a crowded theatre" has never been the law.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:31 pmIt doesn't qualify as disorderly conduct or disturbing the peace?CrimsonNBlue wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:16 pm Dammit, no. The "fire in a crowded theatre" quip is not the law. It is very old dicta that has never been the law.
The answer to your question would depend on the specific state law and, of course, the facts of the situation.
Still a terrible example by Q.
Re: Joe Rogan
Hard to tell, you don't generally use anything to back up your points of view.
Re: Joe Rogan
Rogan at the beginning of the pandemic. Very different.
https://twitter.com/daviddoel/status/14 ... YK4O6rn1QQ
https://twitter.com/daviddoel/status/14 ... YK4O6rn1QQ
I only came to kick some ass...
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Rock the fucking house and kick some ass.
Re: Joe Rogan
The mob going after Rogan's use of the-word-that-I-can't-say is troubling.
The notion that nobody can use that word is also bothersome to me.
I mean, I don't think goyim should never use the word kike if they're using it in a way that is anti-anti-Semitic, or just in the discussion of language, like here.
In fact, saying that you can't use that word even to point out someone's anti-Semitism seems to be trying to act like the word, and thus to an extent anti-Semitism, doesn't exist. And that I have a huge problem with.
The notion that nobody can use that word is also bothersome to me.
I mean, I don't think goyim should never use the word kike if they're using it in a way that is anti-anti-Semitic, or just in the discussion of language, like here.
In fact, saying that you can't use that word even to point out someone's anti-Semitism seems to be trying to act like the word, and thus to an extent anti-Semitism, doesn't exist. And that I have a huge problem with.
Re: Joe Rogan
It's okay to say the N-word as long as you're making fun of republicans while using it.
- KUTradition
- Contributor
- Posts: 11207
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am
Re: Joe Rogan
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
Re: Joe Rogan
It depends. If it is "just making fun of", that's not ok. If it's pointing out their bigotry pejoratively, that's different. Not necessarily accurate, but also not at all racist.BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 5:16 pm It's okay to say the N-word as long as you're making fun of republicans while using it.
Re: Joe Rogan
I about fired a dude because I found a bunch of folders on the network with that name that belonged to him. Turned out it was his nickname.Mjl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:57 pm The mob going after Rogan's use of the-word-that-I-can't-say is troubling.
The notion that nobody can use that word is also bothersome to me.
I mean, I don't think goyim should never use the word k*** if they're using it in a way that is anti-anti-Semitic, or just in the discussion of language, like here.
In fact, saying that you can't use that word even to point out someone's anti-Semitism seems to be trying to act like the word, and thus to an extent anti-Semitism, doesn't exist. And that I have a huge problem with.
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: Joe Rogan
If you are in the public eye and say things that are recorded on a long enough timeline, you will eventually end up running afoul of someone.Mjl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 07, 2022 4:57 pm The mob going after Rogan's use of the-word-that-I-can't-say is troubling.
The notion that nobody can use that word is also bothersome to me.
I mean, I don't think goyim should never use the word kike if they're using it in a way that is anti-anti-Semitic, or just in the discussion of language, like here.
In fact, saying that you can't use that word even to point out someone's anti-Semitism seems to be trying to act like the word, and thus to an extent anti-Semitism, doesn't exist. And that I have a huge problem with.
“First of all, AI is two letters. It’s kind of a fancy thing.” - Scary Smart Brilliant VP Kamala Harris