Page 4 of 100

Re: Charges

Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2023 10:19 pm
by DCHawk1
jfish26 wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:41 pm
randylahey wrote: Tue Mar 21, 2023 8:01 pm Just George soros funded political fodder
Thank you for participating in the Fox talking point one-human centipede, where you swallow talking points whole, shit them out whole, and swallow them right back down.
I mean...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-i-supp ... 1659277441

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:32 am
by randylahey
Don't watch fox, or even cable. Have you looked into George soros? And the people he has funded, not just here, but all across the world. He is believed by some in other countries to be the most corrupt man on the countr

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:35 am
by randylahey
But, coincidentally enough, its a george soros funded DA trying to prosecute Trump. He has funded DAs in several states in what he feels are strategic locations

Theres so much more our elected officials could be doing with their time then still harassing Trump. Its a political abuse of power that ties into 2024

The stormy Daniel's thing was stupid the 1st time around. Beating a dead horse now. Im not saying Trump is innocent, he probably did pay off the porn star that was trying to frame him so he could make it all disappear. But who cares, she tried to frame him, she lost, she technically owes him 300000 in legal fees still

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 5:37 am
by randylahey
This move sets a horrible precedent for this country. Attacking your political enemies. That's all this is. If the Clinton's haven't gone to jail for the 60ish people connected to them that have all mysteriously died (Clinton's had them killed) then i think Trump shouldn't for paying off stormy. If he was Hillary, he would've made stormy disappear forever

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:48 am
by KUTradition
your side shoulda done better

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:50 am
by MICHHAWK
seriously. i didn't know it was against the law for a rich old dude to pay a hooker to keep her yap shut. that's been going on for a thousand years.

you would think we have more important matters to attend to.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:03 am
by jfish26
That’s not what he’s actually in trouble for, but of course who would bother with pesky things like “facts” and “details.”

In any case, I think it’s probably best for all of us to let the MAGAs lose their shit over this issue…so that when the real stuff starts coming down the pike (Georgia and the feds) some of the energy will have been sucked out of the storm.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:06 am
by KUTradition
two words: grand jury

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:21 am
by RainbowsandUnicorns
MICHHAWK wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 7:50 am seriously. i didn't know it was against the law for a rich old dude to pay a hooker to keep her yap shut. that's been going on for a thousand years.

you would think we have more important matters to attend to.
"we"? What important matters do you have to attend to?

Image

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:39 am
by jhawks99
Is that Lansing or DC? Hard to tell these days.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 8:58 am
by jfish26
Just some folks, some tourists.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:11 am
by Sparko
Accidental tourists no doubt. There was a classic New Yorker cartoon about the Barbarian Hordes in Rome. The punchline was "We came for the arts and culture. Sorry if we broke a few things."

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:40 am
by randylahey
Trump aint my pick for 2024. Id take him over biden, but I'd also take anything over the current democratic regime

But it amazes me how terrified of him and desperate to get rid of him the deep state is. That has to make you question why they are so scared of a guy like him. We are on what like year of 8 of trying to find ways to fuck over Trump

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:55 am
by KUTradition
delusional

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:03 am
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:40 am Trump aint my pick for 2024. Id take him over biden, but I'd also take anything over the current democratic regime

But it amazes me how terrified of him and desperate to get rid of him the deep state is. That has to make you question why they are so scared of a guy like him. We are on what like year of 8 of trying to find ways to fuck over Trump
(The Democrats do not want to get rid of Trump, not really; these stupid loyalty tests he's going to put the GOP through (on the way to his inevitable nomination) are terrific for the Democrats, politically.)

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:12 am
by MICHHAWK
same can be said of uncle joe. I suspect the repubs would be in favor of uncle joe being the dems nom.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:13 am
by randylahey
I actually somewhat agree with ya jfish. Trumps personality and "sore loserness" could be bad for the Republican party. They should unite behind someone else. The democrats do want to get rid of him but they think they could divide the Republican party more.

The Republican party is a mess. Democrats stand more united in their party

And yes the pubs are hoping biden is the dem nominee. Both parties and this country will be better off if neither Trump or biden are the main dudes for 2024

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:19 am
by MICHHAWK
I will vote for the wastepaper basket before I will vote for either of our last two presidents.

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:22 am
by KUTradition

Re: Charges

Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:31 am
by jfish26
randylahey wrote: Wed Mar 22, 2023 10:13 am I actually somewhat agree with ya jfish. Trumps personality and "sore loserness" could be bad for the Republican party. They should unite behind someone else. The democrats do want to get rid of him but they think they could divide the Republican party more.

The Republican party is a mess. Democrats stand more united in their party

And yes the pubs are hoping biden is the dem nominee. Both parties and this country will be better off if neither Trump or biden are the main dudes for 2024
The Republicans can't unite behind anyone else, that's the problem.

Their policies are SO unpopular, and their margins are SO small. They can't afford to have any of the base peel off. How much of the base disappears if Trump is off the board (but still, like, alive and not in prison)?

The answer is: more than would be made up by re-attracting Never Trumpers.

The party entered entered into a marriage of convenience with the rubes to stave off political death...and now it's in the finding out portion of FUCK AROUND AND FIND OUT.