Page 32 of 65
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2020 1:26 pm
by Deleted User 318
Not Nice.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:32 am
by Deleted User 289
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 9:56 am
by Shirley
[quote=Grandma post_id=120912 time=1591281139 user_id=289]
Exposed for being the __________ that she is?
-----------------
I wish democrats hadn't caused our fellow Americans to fall for crap like that.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:37 pm
by japhy
https://mashable.com/article/fox-news-f ... thon-joke/
When you are desperate to paint a movement as radical, any source will do.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:27 pm
by Deleted User 289
Is Hannity eating his words tonight or his he too busy sucking Trump's dick?
https://twitter.com/peltzmadeline/statu ... 9642681345
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:39 pm
by Deleted User 289
Tucker vs. Tammy. It's one thing and fine not to agree with her. It's another to become a complete asshole in regards to what you say about her.
Is he really that big of a piece of shit that he has no remorse in saying what he's said about her?
Let's see if Fox shows any morals and makes a statement regarding him. I predict they do.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:01 pm
by ousdahl
I almost bumped this the other day when Fox News aired a photo of Epstein and Maxwell and “mistakenly” cropped out Trump
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 3:10 pm
by Geezer
Tucker is that big an asshole. Just another run of the mill conservative.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:50 pm
by seahawk
When did Republicans become against the military?
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:44 am
by twocoach
seahawk wrote: ↑Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:50 pm
When did Republicans become against the military?
When the mitary became against Trump.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2020 8:57 pm
by sdoyel
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 7:31 am
by ousdahl
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tucker-car ... -backlash/
Tucker Carlson draws backlash after saying 17-year-old Kenosha shooting suspect "maintain[ed] order when no one else would"
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 2:42 pm
by sdoyel
He’s the biggest shit bag on television.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 5:19 pm
by jhawks99
2nd biggest.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:02 am
by Deleted User 89
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:29 am
by ousdahl
You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774712 ... ox-s-lawye
Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:46 am
by Deleted User 310
ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:29 am
You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/91774712 ... ox-s-lawye
Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "
She wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."
Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."
It is entertainment television.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:51 am
by ousdahl
do Fox News viewers know that?
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:52 am
by Deleted User 310
ousdahl wrote: ↑Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:51 am
do Fox News viewers know that?
Many probably don't.
CNN isn't much better...and I watch a lot of CNN.
Re: Fox and Friends
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 am
by ousdahl
death, taxes, and illy bothsidesing.