Fox and Friends

[sdoyel]

https://twitter.com/huffpost/status/149 ... 12608?s=21

[JKLivin]

https://youtu.be/yFZfSPiG5QU

yall just sitting here wasting time...dont think anybody is freeing their mind tho

The definition of waste of time is people I have had on Ignore for months whose names continually crop up as replying to my posts. I have no idea what they’re saying to me, but I also don’t care.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

https://youtu.be/yFZfSPiG5QU

yall just sitting here wasting time...dont think anybody is freeing their mind tho

The definition of waste of time is search.php?author_id=881&sr=posts

FYP?

[JKLivin]

https://youtu.be/yFZfSPiG5QU

yall just sitting here wasting time...dont think anybody is freeing their mind tho

The definition of waste of time is search.php?author_id=881&sr=posts

FYP?

Meh. It amuses me. And I post about 1/10th of your volume, so I’ll just let that marinate.

[MICHHAWK]

how did you know that is my favorite kid rock song.

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

The definition of waste of time is search.php?author_id=881&sr=posts

FYP?

Meh. It amuses me. And I post about 1/10th of your volume, so I’ll just let that marinate.

Posting amuses you or your having people on ignore who respond to your posts amuses you? Either way, I would figure a "well educated" "professor" such as yourself would have better (at least more intellectually stimulating) things to amuse yourself with than to be on this site with the frequency that you are - but hey - whatever floats your boat.

As far as your claim that you post "about 1/10th" of my "volume", to you - does "volume" mean amount of posts or length of posts? If amount of posts, would it be wrong to assume you either don't comprehend basic math or you suffer from delusion? If length of posts, you are probably right. And?

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

how did you know that is my favorite kid rock song.

Let me guess which lyrics are your favorite and the ones you relate to.....

I'ma pimp

Smack all the hoes

I've been sitting here just wasting time

Oh yeah. Huh, oh yeah.

Fuck it

I don't bring much, ain't gotta lot to say

[JKLivin]

FYP?

Meh. It amuses me. And I post about 1/10th of your volume, so I’ll just let that marinate.

Posting amuses you or your having people on ignore who respond to your posts amuses you? Either way, I would figure a "well educated" "professor" such as yourself would have better (at least more intellectually stimulating) things to amuse yourself with than to be on this site with the frequency that you are - but hey - whatever floats your boat.

As far as your claim that you post "about 1/10th" of my "volume", to you - does "volume" mean amount of posts or length of posts? If amount of posts, would it be wrong to assume you either don't comprehend basic math or you suffer from delusion? If length of posts, you are probably right. And?

Lulz. I check in a few times most days, and spend about fifteen minutes total. Seems like you're here a lot more often.

Yes, human behavior fascinates and (sometimes) amuses me. People like Leawood, Sea, and Overlander, who just repeat the same small-minded, predictable attempts to get under my skin, i.e. "Cuck," "You didn't graduate from KU," and "Cunt," aren't worth my time, so they go on Ignore. When I get a notification that they replied to one of my posts, it makes me chuckle, but I don't have to waste energy reading the idiocy.

You, on the other hand, are only counting posts under your current nom de plume. If we added up all of the other iterations that you deleted after a rage-quit episode, your post total would probably be somewhere in the range of ten times mine. And if we're talking about length of posts, you win there, too. Congrats!

Have a great day.

[Overlander]

Cunt

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Meh. It amuses me. And I post about 1/10th of your volume, so I’ll just let that marinate.

Posting amuses you or your having people on ignore who respond to your posts amuses you? Either way, I would figure a "well educated" "professor" such as yourself would have better (at least more intellectually stimulating) things to amuse yourself with than to be on this site with the frequency that you are - but hey - whatever floats your boat.

As far as your claim that you post "about 1/10th" of my "volume", to you - does "volume" mean amount of posts or length of posts? If amount of posts, would it be wrong to assume you either don't comprehend basic math or you suffer from delusion? If length of posts, you are probably right. And?

Lulz. I check in a few times most days, and spend about fifteen minutes total. Seems like you're here a lot more often.

Yes, human behavior fascinates and (sometimes) amuses me. People like Leawood, Sea, and Overlander, who just repeat the same small-minded, predictable attempts to get under my skin, i.e. "Cuck," "You didn't graduate from KU," and "Cunt," aren't worth my time, so they go on Ignore. When I get a notification that they replied to one of my posts, it makes me chuckle, but I don't have to waste energy reading the idiocy.

You, on the other hand, are only counting posts under your current nom de plume. If we added up all of the other iterations that you deleted after a rage-quit episode, your post total would probably be somewhere in the range of ten times mine. And if we're talking about length of posts, you win there, too. Congrats!

Have a great day.

Yes, I am only counting posts under MY "current nom de plume". Just as I am only counting posts under YOUR "current nom de plume".

You claim you post 1/10th of what I do.

Let's all take a look here. As of 6:50am on 2/10/22

JKLivin
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

RainbowsandUnicorns
Posts: 883
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

I'm not a math whiz so please forgive me if my numbers are wrong but it just doesn't seem to equate to 1/10th.
You have been posting under your "current nom de plume" for about 300 days while I have been posting under mine for about 100.
Seems you post about an average of 2.4 posts per day.
Seems I post about an average of 8.8 posts per day.

Obviously I post more frequently than you do (on a daily average basis) but you tell me and the rest of those reading this - do the numbers I provided equate to 1/10th?


ANYWAYS,
Did anyone catch Vernon on F&F?
I would like for Vernon to define "revolution" and I would like to know if he and the Pubs will really try and get Trump to become President through a back door method. My hope is Trump is going through several legal battles in court rooms by then.

https://twitter.com/RepVernonJones/stat ... 4155931648

https://www.newsweek.com/vernon-jones-i ... ms-1677951

[JKLivin]

Posting amuses you or your having people on ignore who respond to your posts amuses you? Either way, I would figure a "well educated" "professor" such as yourself would have better (at least more intellectually stimulating) things to amuse yourself with than to be on this site with the frequency that you are - but hey - whatever floats your boat.

As far as your claim that you post "about 1/10th" of my "volume", to you - does "volume" mean amount of posts or length of posts? If amount of posts, would it be wrong to assume you either don't comprehend basic math or you suffer from delusion? If length of posts, you are probably right. And?

Lulz. I check in a few times most days, and spend about fifteen minutes total. Seems like you're here a lot more often.

Yes, human behavior fascinates and (sometimes) amuses me. People like Leawood, Sea, and Overlander, who just repeat the same small-minded, predictable attempts to get under my skin, i.e. "Cuck," "You didn't graduate from KU," and "Cunt," aren't worth my time, so they go on Ignore. When I get a notification that they replied to one of my posts, it makes me chuckle, but I don't have to waste energy reading the idiocy.

You, on the other hand, are only counting posts under your current nom de plume. If we added up all of the other iterations that you deleted after a rage-quit episode, your post total would probably be somewhere in the range of ten times mine. And if we're talking about length of posts, you win there, too. Congrats!

Have a great day.

Yes, I am only counting posts under MY "current nom de plume". Just as I am only counting posts under YOUR "current nom de plume".

You claim you post 1/10th of what I do.

Let's all take a look here. As of 6:50am on 2/10/22

JKLivin
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

RainbowsandUnicorns
Posts: 883
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

I'm not a math whiz so please forgive me if my numbers are wrong but it just doesn't seem to equate to 1/10th.
You have been posting under your "current nom de plume" for about 300 days while I have been posting under mine for about 100.
Seems you post about an average of 2.4 posts per day.
Seems I post about an average of 8.8 posts per day.

Obviously I post more frequently than you do (on a daily average basis) but you tell me and the rest of those reading this - do the numbers I provided equate to 1/10th?


ANYWAYS,
Did anyone catch Vernon on F&F?
I would like for Vernon to define "revolution" and I would like to know if he and the Pubs will really try and get Trump to become President through a back door method. My hope is Trump is going through several legal battles in court rooms by then.

https://twitter.com/RepVernonJones/stat ... 4155931648

https://www.newsweek.com/vernon-jones-i ... ms-1677951

So, you went to all that time and effort to establish that I post about 25% of what you do? Hey, if that makes you feel better, then good job!

[RainbowsandUnicorns]

Lulz. I check in a few times most days, and spend about fifteen minutes total. Seems like you're here a lot more often.

Yes, human behavior fascinates and (sometimes) amuses me. People like Leawood, Sea, and Overlander, who just repeat the same small-minded, predictable attempts to get under my skin, i.e. "Cuck," "You didn't graduate from KU," and "Cunt," aren't worth my time, so they go on Ignore. When I get a notification that they replied to one of my posts, it makes me chuckle, but I don't have to waste energy reading the idiocy.

You, on the other hand, are only counting posts under your current nom de plume. If we added up all of the other iterations that you deleted after a rage-quit episode, your post total would probably be somewhere in the range of ten times mine. And if we're talking about length of posts, you win there, too. Congrats!

Have a great day.

Yes, I am only counting posts under MY "current nom de plume". Just as I am only counting posts under YOUR "current nom de plume".

You claim you post 1/10th of what I do.

Let's all take a look here. As of 6:50am on 2/10/22

JKLivin
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

RainbowsandUnicorns
Posts: 883
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

I'm not a math whiz so please forgive me if my numbers are wrong but it just doesn't seem to equate to 1/10th.
You have been posting under your "current nom de plume" for about 300 days while I have been posting under mine for about 100.
Seems you post about an average of 2.4 posts per day.
Seems I post about an average of 8.8 posts per day.

Obviously I post more frequently than you do (on a daily average basis) but you tell me and the rest of those reading this - do the numbers I provided equate to 1/10th?


ANYWAYS,
Did anyone catch Vernon on F&F?
I would like for Vernon to define "revolution" and I would like to know if he and the Pubs will really try and get Trump to become President through a back door method. My hope is Trump is going through several legal battles in court rooms by then.

https://twitter.com/RepVernonJones/stat ... 4155931648

https://www.newsweek.com/vernon-jones-i ... ms-1677951

So, you went to all that time and effort to establish that I post about 25% of what you do? Hey, if that makes you feel better, then good job!

Yes, I went through about 5 minutes of time (and very little "effort") while I was drinking a cup of coffee to establish that you made a false claim in regards to me. Does it make me feel better? Not really but it doesn't make me feel worse either.
Moving on from our basically petty but still somewhat worthy (to me) dispute.........

[JKLivin]

Yes, I am only counting posts under MY "current nom de plume". Just as I am only counting posts under YOUR "current nom de plume".

You claim you post 1/10th of what I do.

Let's all take a look here. As of 6:50am on 2/10/22

JKLivin
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 10:28 am

RainbowsandUnicorns
Posts: 883
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

I'm not a math whiz so please forgive me if my numbers are wrong but it just doesn't seem to equate to 1/10th.
You have been posting under your "current nom de plume" for about 300 days while I have been posting under mine for about 100.
Seems you post about an average of 2.4 posts per day.
Seems I post about an average of 8.8 posts per day.

Obviously I post more frequently than you do (on a daily average basis) but you tell me and the rest of those reading this - do the numbers I provided equate to 1/10th?


ANYWAYS,
Did anyone catch Vernon on F&F?
I would like for Vernon to define "revolution" and I would like to know if he and the Pubs will really try and get Trump to become President through a back door method. My hope is Trump is going through several legal battles in court rooms by then.

https://twitter.com/RepVernonJones/stat ... 4155931648

https://www.newsweek.com/vernon-jones-i ... ms-1677951

So, you went to all that time and effort to establish that I post about 25% of what you do? Hey, if that makes you feel better, then good job!

Yes, I went through about 5 minutes of time (and very little "effort") while I was drinking a cup of coffee to establish that you made a false claim in regards to me. Does it make me feel better? Not really but it doesn't make me feel worse either.
Moving on from our basically petty but still somewhat worthy (to me) dispute.........

It's all good. I am admittedly prone to hyperbole, and have no problem with it being pointed out when done respectfully - as you did.

[sdoyel]

What mandate(s)?

https://twitter.com/acyn/status/1491945 ... 09857?s=21

[Qusdahl]

The thought of American labor realizing their strength in organizing is a scary scary thought. They’re so close to getting it!

Fortunately, Q makes sure that they never actually do get it, cuz they’re too outraged about stoopid shit instead.

Get ‘em so caught up in culture war that they never give thought to the class war they really need!

[sdoyel]

https://twitter.com/walshfreedom/status ... 84037?s=21

[jhawks99]

Seems reasonable to me. We wouldn't like it if Russia was setting up nukes in Cuba.

[KUTradition]

Ukraine should be allowed to join NATO if they so desire, regardless of what the US or Russia wants

[Deleted User 863]

Ukraine should be allowed to join NATO if they so desire

Why?

[KUTradition]

why not?

they are a sovereign nation, and outside of nuclear proliferation should be able to pursue the means they deem necessary for their protection

do you know why and when NATO was formed, and what it takes for a country to join?

(hint: just because they may want to, doesn’t mean they can, necessarily)

edit: after looking at my original post, i realize i should have said they should be allowed to pursue inclusion in NATO if they so desire