Shoe money trial

Kansas Basketball.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by jfish26 »

holidaysmore wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:34 pm The judge added that he wanted to send "a great big warning light to the basketball world.''

And proceeded to sentence them to six, six and nine months. What a joke. With good behavior, collectively they won't end up serving even half of that.
The warning being what exactly? Don't you fucking dare play a part in poor, black gets getting compensated closer to their worth?

Great. Glad we're here.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by jfish26 »

Evil Men Sentenced To Prison For Giving College Basketball Players Some Money

https://deadspin.com/evil-men-sentenced ... 1833075677
After the sentences were announced, U.S. Attorney Robert Khuzami got hyperbolically moralistic about the fact that these guys would spend time behind bars:

“The sentences imposed today only begin to reflect the magnitude of the harm these defendants caused through a scheme that not only defrauded multiple public universities but upended the lives of young student-athletes and corrupted a game cherished by so many. Today’s sentences send a clear message to those who might be similarly tempted to corrupt collegiate athletics for their own personal gain that defrauding schools in connection with athletic scholarships is not just a rules violation but a crime, one that will result in a prison term.”

What exactly was the “magnitude of the harm?” Let’s recap:

[...]

*Gatto and former Adidas consultant Thomas Gassnola (who is awaiting his own sentence) funneled $90,000 to Billy Preston’s family, and agreed to funnel money to the legal guardian of Silvio De Sousa, so both would commit to play for Adidas-sponsored Kansas.

[...]

No doubt, some harm came out of these actions.

[...]

Preston fell under NCAA investigation over the “financial picture” of his vehicle after he was involved in a car accident in November 2017, and never played a regular season game for Kansas. He left school in January of 2018 as the investigation dragged on, and he’s in the NBA’s developmental league now.

De Sousa is still at Kansas, and played as a freshman. But the NCAA ruled that he would be forced to sit out the entirety of his 2018-19 and 2019-20 season, because of something he says he didn’t even know about.

So, yes, Khuzami is right that these payments “upended the lives of young student-athletes,” but in every case the harm was caused by the NCAA’s draconian punishments for accepting money that the players should have already been entitled to. Gatto, Code, and Dawkins are by no means noble men just for giving some folks cash, but what they’re really going to prison for is simply carrying out a basic [tenet] of capitalism: paying the people who will help them make more money.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by jfish26 »

Judge's light sentencing in first hoops corruption trial sets stage for future fireworks

https://sports.yahoo.com/judge-hands-ou ... 33569.html
Gatto, a 48-year-old Adidas executive, was facing a recommended 46 to 57 months in prison. Instead, he got nine months.

Dawkins, a 26-year-old basketball middleman, and Code, a 45-year-old Adidas consultant, were staring at 30 to 37 months. They got six.

Kaplan then afforded them the courtesy of choosing their prison, namely whatever minimum-security federal camp was closest to their homes. How's a few months in Club Fed for you? Not that any of them are due to report until after they exhaust appeals, which could take years. It's not out of the question that the Federal Bureau of Prisons just gives them house arrest. Anything is possible.

Simply put, sentencing day couldn't have gone much better for the convicts.

"It's a fair sentence," said Dawkins’ attorney Steve Haney. "It's a lenient sentence."

As much as Kaplan wanted to take this seriously, as often as he noted that they were clearly guilty and knew what they were doing was wrong and just saying that everyone else does it also isn't a real defense ... well, this is still college basketball. Here at the Southern District of New York, cases are routinely about insider trading, drug-trafficking and terrorism.

[...]

The short sentences didn't just take the air out of the government's convictions in a case that began 18 months ago with bold talk and the promise of significant punishments. It sets the stage for the second trial in April, where Dawkins and Code are charged with bribing college assistant coaches to steer top NBA prospects to them for future representation.

If the defense has its way, then that is going to be a trial as much about the culture, and reality, of college basketball, as it is their clients.

Although Kaplan won't preside over the second trial, his sentencing suggests there’s a potential winning argument that this entire sport is a fraud, and turning NCAA rules into pseudo-federal statutes isn't fair. Diskant may have deftly won with the jury, but in the end, Judge Kaplan was sympathetic to reality.

[...]

Full of confidence following Kaplan's sentencing, the fight is on, two defendants more than willing to tear everything down because they have nothing much to lose — and maybe so little time to serve even if they do.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28789
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by ousdahl »

whoa whoa whoa!

so the actual criminals get six months. Meanwhile, Silvio gets two years.

For fuck's sake!
Deleted User 75

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 75 »

Silvio is going to prison?
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28789
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by ousdahl »

for fuck’s sake.
Deleted User 75

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 75 »

You compared prison to college eligibility, not me.
Deleted User 141

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 141 »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:39 pm
holidaysmore wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:34 pm The judge added that he wanted to send "a great big warning light to the basketball world.''

And proceeded to sentence them to six, six and nine months. What a joke. With good behavior, collectively they won't end up serving even half of that.
The warning being what exactly? Don't you fucking dare play a part in poor, black gets getting compensated closer to their worth?

Great. Glad we're here.
Only problem I have with that statement is that it focuses on the poor, black kids being victims, instead of focusing on a giant mostly white controlled executive group being villains.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Gqcolorado wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:32 am
jfish26 wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:39 pm
holidaysmore wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:34 pm The judge added that he wanted to send "a great big warning light to the basketball world.''

And proceeded to sentence them to six, six and nine months. What a joke. With good behavior, collectively they won't end up serving even half of that.
The warning being what exactly? Don't you fucking dare play a part in poor, black gets getting compensated closer to their worth?

Great. Glad we're here.
Only problem I have with that statement is that it focuses on the poor, black kids being victims, instead of focusing on a giant mostly white controlled executive group being villains.
If you truly believe the “villain” part of your statement, then you believe the bs that KU and all the other schools are big victims in this whole thing. Because that’s the only route to this being a punishable crime.
Deleted User 141

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 141 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:41 am
Gqcolorado wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:32 am
jfish26 wrote: Tue Mar 05, 2019 2:39 pm

The warning being what exactly? Don't you fucking dare play a part in poor, black gets getting compensated closer to their worth?

Great. Glad we're here.
Only problem I have with that statement is that it focuses on the poor, black kids being victims, instead of focusing on a giant mostly white controlled executive group being villains.
If you truly believe the “villain” part of your statement, then you believe the bs that KU and all the other schools are big victims in this whole thing. Because that’s the only route to this being a punishable crime.
Not sure how you think I’d believe KU is a victim based on what I said. Quite the opposite.
Deleted User 141

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 141 »

Oh, and definitely don’t think this is a punishable crime...these dudes are middle men for middle men for middle men.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Gqcolorado wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:52 am Oh, and definitely don’t think this is a punishable crime...these dudes are middle men for middle men for middle men.
Gotcha. It's just that the only way to vilify the adidas middle men is to say they defrauded KU, and KU is the poor victim entitled to $1.2 million.

Silvio became collateral damage, but that's because of the NCAA's backward ass rules.
Deleted User 141

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 141 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:00 am
Gqcolorado wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:52 am Oh, and definitely don’t think this is a punishable crime...these dudes are middle men for middle men for middle men.
Gotcha. It's just that the only way to vilify the adidas middle men is to say they defrauded KU, and KU is the poor victim entitled to $1.2 million.

Silvio became collateral damage, but that's because of the NCAA's backward ass rules.
Not really, imo, which might be totally naive and not based I. How things work....

But you have two organizations both protecting large to giant monetary resources and scapegoating adidas.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Agree, but more accurately, these 3 bag men are the scapegoats.

There's just no guilty verdict without the prosecutor and the schools saying the schools were fucked over.

I of course don't believe that, thus I don't find these guys to be some awful villains--which was jfish's point. Behind bars for 9 months for giving a basketball player money for being good at basketball.
Deleted User 141

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by Deleted User 141 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:06 am Agree, but more accurately, these 3 bag men are the scapegoats.

There's just no guilty verdict without the prosecutor and the schools saying the schools were fucked over.

I of course don't believe that, thus I don't find these guys to be some awful villains--which was jfish's point. Behind bars for 9 months for giving a basketball player money for being good at basketball.
Very true about the players. But this trial not really about them. I’m with you and fish.

But hey, they legal system. These guys have enough money and lawyers to stay insulated so far.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by jfish26 »

User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

Watching most of these sports journos trip and stumble through legal and NCAA issues has been rather embarrassing. And hilarious.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by jfish26 »

At this point, self-reporting or self-imposing punishments is a fireable offense for an AD or coach.
User avatar
DCHawk1
Contributor
Posts: 8546
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by DCHawk1 »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 1:26 pm ...can't tell if serious:

https://twitter.com/DanWolken/status/11 ... 9610326018
@YahooForde
Imjustheretohelpyoubuycrypto
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28789
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Shoe money trial

Post by ousdahl »

jfish26 wrote: Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:14 pm At this point, self-reporting or self-imposing punishments is a fireable offense for an AD or coach.
^^^

I think these is among the foremost of issues that will he tested going forward. If the NCAA is going to have no consideration for any good faith or self-reporting, then what are they gonna do when every school just denies, denies, denies?
Post Reply