Kansas Crimson

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm**

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:34 pm Made for TV.

So, do these "stolen emails" that wiki leaks has contain false information? Or are people just pissed that wiki leaks has them and leaked some of the info to ruin Hillary?

When did Julian Assange become so hated? I thought 5 years ago or so the left loved him?

(Honest questions)
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:50 pm**

I thought Stone's Nixon Salute on the courthouse steps was cute.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:01 pm**

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:34 pm Made for TV.

So, do these "stolen emails" that wiki leaks has contain false information? Or are people just pissed that wiki leaks has them and leaked some of the info to ruin Hillary?

When did Julian Assange become so hated? I thought 5 years ago or so the left loved him?

(Honest questions)
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.

What's "not right here" is your grasp on reality and pretty much every fact you stated in your post.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:07 pm**

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:34 pm Made for TV.

So, do these "stolen emails" that wiki leaks has contain false information? Or are people just pissed that wiki leaks has them and leaked some of the info to ruin Hillary?

When did Julian Assange become so hated? I thought 5 years ago or so the left loved him?

(Honest questions)
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.

It always comes back to Hillary.
So predictable.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:25 pm**

twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:01 pm
dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.
What's "not right here" is your grasp on reality and pretty much every fact you stated in your post.

Pretty much? but not every fact.

We'll see what happens in court in a year or so.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:28 pm**

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:07 pm
dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.
It always comes back to Hillary.
So predictable.

Hillary not saying much these days. So I guess she not going to announce.
Hillary: the cat that swallowed the canary.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:49 pm**

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:18 pm**

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 2:44 pm
IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 1:34 pm Made for TV.

So, do these "stolen emails" that wiki leaks has contain false information? Or are people just pissed that wiki leaks has them and leaked some of the info to ruin Hillary?

When did Julian Assange become so hated? I thought 5 years ago or so the left loved him?

(Honest questions)
I can only speak for myself. My issue is that members of a presidential candidate appear to have worked with an outside party, who appear to have worked with a major foreign adversary to steal information from an opposition and use that information to affect the results of our Presidential election.

My feelings about what those emails contained are irrelevant to my problem with what was done with them. We have had ample discussions about what they contained in countless other threads. There is nothing that could be in them to make me OK with wjat was dome with them. Two separate issues.

And I have never "loved" Assange. What I knew prior to this mess were that he was a wanted criminal hiding from extradition. I dont recall why without looking it up.

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.

Mueller has the goods on Stone. If he wants to stay silent, good possibility Stone will die in prison. I hope this was all worth it for him.

And Dolt, I thought you had me on "ignore?" I knew you couldn't give me up.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:34 pm**

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:28 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:07 pm
dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.
It always comes back to Hillary.
So predictable.
Hillary not saying much these days. So I guess she not going to announce.
Hillary: the cat that swallowed the canary.

She doesn't need to say a thing.

Do you honestly believe that there is no correlation between Stone getting shackled and Trump bowing down?

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:40 pm**

So when does one of the kids get picked up?

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:27 pm**

RussianHawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:40 pm So when does one of the kids get picked up?

I would snatch up Tiffany. That would scare the fuck out of Cheeto Tenenbaum.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:07 pm**

jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:27 pm
RussianHawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:40 pm So when does one of the kids get picked up?
I would snatch up Tiffany. That would scare the fuck out of Cheeto Tenenbaum.

Would he even notice?

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:17 pm**

RussianHawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 7:07 pm
jeepinjayhawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 6:27 pm
RussianHawk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 5:40 pm So when does one of the kids get picked up?
I would snatch up Tiffany. That would scare the fuck out of Cheeto Tenenbaum.
Would he even notice?

Touche

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:04 pm**

Anybody left from the campaign that hasn't been indicted yet?

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:14 pm**

ummmm....Hillary?

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 9:34 pm**

I was referring to the Law & order party.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 11:11 pm**

dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:25 pm
twocoach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 4:01 pm
dolomite wrote: ↑Fri Jan 25, 2019 3:34 pm

So it's ok for the Dems to collude with Russia to dig up dirt on Trump,(Russian Dossier) but not ok for the GOP to do the same to Hilldawggy. Something not right here. Dirty, dirty business, the state of American politics.

Where is the proven collusion with Russia? Stone will roll never over on his friend Trump.

Gordon Liddy says hello.
What's "not right here" is your grasp on reality and pretty much every fact you stated in your post.
Pretty much? but not every fact.

We'll see what happens in court in a year or so.

What's funny is that you seem to think that Mueller is done with these guys. He's just getting Stone up on the rack to let him get a little taste of federal prison. I doubt that this is the last indictment that includes his name. We're in the opening quarter of this game still.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2019 11:50 pm**

It's pure gold when the Nixon foundation puts out a press release saying that Stone had nothing to do with Nixon, Stone's double-V sign notwithstanding. Too dirty for Nixon!!

Can we say "pining for a pardon" boys and girls?

Posted: **Sat Jan 26, 2019 10:31 am**

To the disappointment of many of you, no collusion with Russia.

Posted: **Sat Jan 26, 2019 10:56 am**

which makes all of his ok

Kansas Crimson

i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking

Re: i wonder what Robert Mueller is thinking