Kansas Crimson

RussianHawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 12:09 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 11:20 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:52 pm

I'm not rich and I got a tax cut! And I'm NOT complaining!

And I got the largest raise I've gotten in 7 years because the owner/my company got a tax break.

#bossmove

Huh that's interesting. I didn't get a raise from my boss because of the tax break.

Company wide employees got larger than normal raises and cost of living adjustments. I'm sure it's not like that everywhere though. Hopefully a lot of places though.

RussianHawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 12:09 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 11:20 pm

dolomite wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 4:52 pm

I'm not rich and I got a tax cut! And I'm NOT complaining!

And I got the largest raise I've gotten in 7 years because the owner/my company got a tax break.

#bossmove

Huh that's interesting. I didn't get a raise from my boss because of the tax break.

We got a one time $1,000 bonus after the payout to the rich folks and , which of course was taxed at the fed supplemental rate of 25%.

Imagine how much of a tax break my company had to get to give each of our 5,000+ employees a $1,000 bonus. If everyone in the company got that same bonus, then that's $5 million in bonuses for those who don't feel like doing math on a Sunday.

And like I said, that one time bonus doesn't cover even half of the amount that my taxes will go up this year.

Apparently, there is something to be learned by the second kick of a mule"?

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1089549632131215360

Feral wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 5:01 pm Apparently, there is something to be learned by the second kick of a mule"?

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1089549632131215360

Whatever it takes.

twocoach wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 2:25 pm

RussianHawk wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 12:09 pm

IllinoisJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jan 26, 2019 11:20 pm

And I got the largest raise I've gotten in 7 years because the owner/my company got a tax break.

#bossmove

Huh that's interesting. I didn't get a raise from my boss because of the tax break.

We got a one time $1,000 bonus after the payout to the rich folks and , which of course was taxed at the fed supplemental rate of 25%.

That's withholding. Bonus isn't taxed different than any other wages.

dolomite wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 5:28 pm

Feral wrote: ↑Sun Jan 27, 2019 5:01 pm Apparently, there is something to be learned by the second kick of a mule"?

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1089549632131215360

Whatever it takes.

Toddlers usually are bound and determined to learn the hard way.

Z'is go here?

https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/ ... 2668061696

LOL

#BossMove

Trump negative 51

to Pelosi's 47...

doesn't that tweet contradict itself?

the tweet doesn't say "biggest drop," it says, "now the most unpopular."

but according to the negative numbers, there's still somebody that's still more unpopularer...

dangit Illy deleted his post

lulz

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:44 am the tweet doesn't say "biggest drop," it says, "now the most unpopular."

but according to the negative numbers, there's still somebody that's still more unpopularer...

I deleted....but I'm guessing it's because he's got a bigger favorable rating. That's why he isn't the most unpopular.

Even the dems hate pelosi.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:44 am dangit Illy deleted his post

lulz

Sorry! I was confused too.

that could be argued among the reasons why I don't think the left could ever produce a candidate quite like Trump.

libs seem less afraid to criticize their own, while conservatives remain in lockstep.

and either way, there's still only one politician in the poll of whom a majority thinks negatively.

ousdahl wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:52 am that could be argued among the reasons why I don't think the left could ever produce a candidate quite like Trump.

libs seem less afraid to criticize their own, while conservatives remain in lockstep.

and either way, there's still only one politician in the poll of whom a majority thinks negatively.

Polls: highly unreliable. Formed to influence or disparage politicians. How can anyone believe in'em?
Especially that one in 2016 that had Hilldawg at a 90% chance to win. LOL

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:47 am https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... 693677002/

Though it's unclear the extent of damage inside the park, photos have shown graffiti and felled Joshua trees. Three hundred years to recover, and they say Trump has an issue with hyperbole.

idiot

http://www.flowersociety.org/JT_Botanical.htm