F the NCAA

Kansas Basketball.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

(Shelby waves from the back row.)
Deleted User 62

Re: F the NCAA

Post by Deleted User 62 »

jfish26 wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:34 am (Selby waves from the back row.)
User avatar
Lonestarjayhawk
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:27 am
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: F the NCAA

Post by Lonestarjayhawk »

The NBPA is looking at it wrong. They should see that owners are trading rookie scale salaries for older player's established salaries. Better deal for the owners...
LONESTARJAYHAWK
Hall of Fame Contributor
First Ballot illy, dickvard and glugger - - Least Favorite Poster
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

I don't know about that. These old veteran guys are taking pennies on the dollar and usually on one year deals.

They're also taking mid level exception contracts. Can't do that with rookies.
User avatar
PortlandHawk
Posts: 468
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 5:29 pm

Re: F the NCAA

Post by PortlandHawk »

So... any movement in the Silvio appeal?
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18946
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by twocoach »

TraditionKU wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:29 am heard a comment the other day that if whomever had the first pick in the draft each year would just take the best high school prospect, that they’d “miss” only about 30% of the time...at most
2011 Rivals 150:

1) Austin Rivers
2) Anthony Davis

2015:

1) Skal Labissiere
2) Ben Simmons

2006:
1) Greg Oden
2) Kevin Durant
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

twocoach wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 5:58 am
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:29 am heard a comment the other day that if whomever had the first pick in the draft each year would just take the best high school prospect, that they’d “miss” only about 30% of the time...at most
2011 Rivals 150:

1) Austin Rivers
2) Anthony Davis

2015:

1) Skal Labissiere
2) Ben Simmons

2006:
1) Greg Oden
2) Kevin Durant
...so what you're saying is that, in the eighteen drafts from and after 2006, there would have been three misses? 16.67%?
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

That also assumes that the high school recruiting media and NBA scouts are in agreement over who the #1 HS prospect is and is accordingly reflected in their respective rankings. That's certainly not the case.

e.g. Selby and Irving.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18946
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by twocoach »

jfish26 wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:11 am
twocoach wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 5:58 am
TraditionKU wrote: Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:29 am heard a comment the other day that if whomever had the first pick in the draft each year would just take the best high school prospect, that they’d “miss” only about 30% of the time...at most
2011 Rivals 150:

1) Austin Rivers
2) Anthony Davis

2015:

1) Skal Labissiere
2) Ben Simmons

2006:
1) Greg Oden
2) Kevin Durant
...so what you're saying is that, in the eighteen drafts from and after 2006, there would have been three misses? 16.67%?
No. Those were just the most egregious ones. There are numerous others that would have been a miss based on the fit with the team that picked first.
NDballer13
Posts: 1734
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by NDballer13 »

twocoach wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:29 am
jfish26 wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:11 am
twocoach wrote: Mon Mar 04, 2019 5:58 am

2011 Rivals 150:

1) Austin Rivers
2) Anthony Davis

2015:

1) Skal Labissiere
2) Ben Simmons

2006:
1) Greg Oden
2) Kevin Durant
...so what you're saying is that, in the eighteen drafts from and after 2006, there would have been three misses? 16.67%?
No. Those were just the most egregious ones. There are numerous others that would have been a miss based on the fit with the team that picked first.
2008 was BJ Mullens ahead of Jrue Holiday and DeRozan. 2010 was Selby. 2012 was Shabazz Muhammed. 2014 was Jahlil Okafor. Michael Porter Jr would have been the #1 pick.

Use those 4 years and your miss goes up to 7/18 for almost 40%.
kubandalum
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 3:22 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by kubandalum »

“When you think of the good old days, think one word: dentistry.” — P.J. O’Rourke
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by Cascadia »

kubandalum wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:34 am https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/art ... 81209.html

New bill introduced in Congress.
I like
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

There's one percolating in the state legislature of California as well. Good.
hartjack8
Contributor
Posts: 901
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:33 pm

Re: F the NCAA

Post by hartjack8 »

Judge rules against NCAA in antitrust lawsuit

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/stor ... st-lawsuit

The NCAA is going to mess this up. They can get ahead of this or continue to put there head in the sand.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28793
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by ousdahl »

kubandalum wrote: Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:34 am https://www.newsobserver.com/sports/art ... 81209.html

New bill introduced in Congress.
The mere fact that this is getting the attention of federal lawmakers, and may ultimately take a fucking act of Congress, is an indicator of just how big the problem really is.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

Certainly, the cost (in both dollars and investigative and prosecutorial resources) that has gone into carrying the NCAA’s water is shameful and reason enough to want change.
NDballer13
Posts: 1734
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by NDballer13 »

More coaches indicted today. This time completely unrelated to paying players. Apparently taking brides to label kids as "athletes" so they get lower standards to be accepted.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

I get the sense this really isn't about basketball, but is about abusing status as a non-revenue-sport athlete to get admission.

(It's here I'd note that basketball (and, most notably, the efforts of generally poor, black kids) presently subsidizes the education of these (generally, rich, white) kids who weren't qualified to get into the schools in the first place).
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15988
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: F the NCAA

Post by jfish26 »

Also - it's pretty fucking terrific that the NCAA has enough time to find reason to suspend de Sousa for two seasons, while not even bothering to see if non-revenue-sports kids even play sports.
User avatar
NewtonHawk11
Posts: 12826
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:48 am
Location: Kansas

Re: F the NCAA

Post by NewtonHawk11 »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:49 pm Also - it's pretty fucking terrific that the NCAA has enough time to find reason to suspend de Sousa for two seasons, while not even bothering to see if non-revenue-sports kids even play sports.
That’s the most bizarre thing. Like how does someone get admitted as an athlete, but they weren’t even on rosters or anything like that.

So dumb. NCAA is completely deflating more and more each day.
“I don’t remember anything he said, but it was a very memorable speech.” Julian Wright on a speech Michael Jordan gave to a group he was in

"But don’t ever get it twisted, it’s Rock Chalk forever." MG
Post Reply