Veep
-
Deleted User 289
Re: Veep
My worthless 2 cents. I am not happy he hasn't made an announcement yet. Reason being, it tells me he is not completely enamored with someone. Would be great if he could/would say, "This person was far and away without question who I felt was the best choice". Not it tells me he has/had strong reasons why he was considering NOT choosing the person he chooses.
Re: Veep
When has there ever been a pick made so far before the convention? Just because the media is talking about it more doesn't mean he's taking longer.Grandma wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:14 am My worthless 2 cents. I am not happy he hasn't made an announcement yet. Reason being, it tells me he is not completely enamored with someone. Would be great if he could/would say, "This person was far and away without question who I felt was the best choice". Not it tells me he has/had strong reasons why he was considering NOT choosing the person he chooses.
Re: Veep
At this point the VP is inconsequential with regards to deciding who to vote for in November. As soon as that person is announced they become a target for the smear and a desperate plea to get voters to change their decision based upon "new, explosive" information.
Why give the trumpublicans more time to work on that?
Why give the trumpublicans more time to work on that?
I saw the worst minds of my generation empowered by madness, bloated farcical naked,
dragging themselves through the whitewashed streets at dawn looking for a grievance fix.
dragging themselves through the whitewashed streets at dawn looking for a grievance fix.
Re: Veep
The VPs for the 2016 election were picked the 2nd and 3rd week of July.Grandma wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:14 am My worthless 2 cents. I am not happy he hasn't made an announcement yet. Reason being, it tells me he is not completely enamored with someone. Would be great if he could/would say, "This person was far and away without question who I felt was the best choice". Not it tells me he has/had strong reasons why he was considering NOT choosing the person he chooses.
The VP pick for Romney in 2012 wasn't until August 11th.
The VP picks for the 2008 election were made on August 23rd (for Obama) and August 29th (McCain).
This isnt weird or late. We're just hearing more about this one.
-
Deleted User 318
Re: Veep
A black woman on the ticket can help put some senate senate seats such as in Georgia in play. It's about turnout at this point. I think whatever puts more Senate seats on the cusp of flipping is what will be chosen.japhy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:23 am At this point the VP is inconsequential with regards to deciding who to vote for in November. As soon as that person is announced they become a target for the smear and a desperate plea to get voters to change their decision based upon "new, explosive" information.
Why give the trumpublicans more time to work on that?
Re: Veep
I don't buy that. Black people overwhelming chose a white person over black people in the primaries.NiceDC wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:33 amA black woman on the ticket can help put some senate senate seats such as in Georgia in play. It's about turnout at this point. I think whatever puts more Senate seats on the cusp of flipping is what will be chosen.japhy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:23 am At this point the VP is inconsequential with regards to deciding who to vote for in November. As soon as that person is announced they become a target for the smear and a desperate plea to get voters to change their decision based upon "new, explosive" information.
Why give the trumpublicans more time to work on that?
-
Deleted User 318
Re: Veep
That's pragmatic voting. If given a choice, black folks often will choose a white person over a black person in the primaries, because they assume the white person is more likely to win against the other white person that doesn't always have black folks in mind.Mjl wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:37 pmI don't buy that. Black people overwhelming chose a white person over black people in the primaries.NiceDC wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:33 amA black woman on the ticket can help put some senate senate seats such as in Georgia in play. It's about turnout at this point. I think whatever puts more Senate seats on the cusp of flipping is what will be chosen.japhy wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:23 am At this point the VP is inconsequential with regards to deciding who to vote for in November. As soon as that person is announced they become a target for the smear and a desperate plea to get voters to change their decision based upon "new, explosive" information.
Why give the trumpublicans more time to work on that?
But in a general election, they are going to still vote for the lesser of two evils, but also get excited to see someone that looks like them a heartbeat from the presidency.
There's a lot of evidence of this, so I won't link them here, but can dig them up if you like.
Re: Veep
You guys are talking past each other a little bit. There's no doubt that Biden will win the black vote by something like a 95/5 margin, regardless of his VP pick.
The crucial item, though, is turnout. Growing the pool of those voting so overwhelmingly in favor of Biden is the most obvious path to a landslide (which is what it might take to stay clear of bullshit).
The crucial item, though, is turnout. Growing the pool of those voting so overwhelmingly in favor of Biden is the most obvious path to a landslide (which is what it might take to stay clear of bullshit).
-
Deleted User 318
Re: Veep
Per Twocoach, Palin was announced Aug 29. My guess is no one wanted to be steamrolled by Obama, so they grabbed some random mayor from Alaska because she was the only one willing to jump on the ticket.
Re: Veep
Read or watch "Game Change" if you really want to learn about Sarah Palin. She may have been the only one willing to jump into the mix, but they also saw her as a shining star in need of a little bit of polishing.
Re: Veep
This is all accurateNiceDC wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:59 pm I think MJL is saying having a black person on the bottom of the ticket wouldn't increase turnout. I don't think there was a miscommunication. But I think he might be telling himself that slightly because he's not a fan of the most likely pick of Kamala Harris.