$600
Re: $600
He redlined it supposedly adding a conditional 2k payment and removing some foreign payments. So congress is supposed to discuss and revote. So, it means nothing and were gonna get 600....maybe. or something. Dumb bill.
Just Ledoux it
Re: $600
This...is not a thing. It's an ineffectual temper tantrum.
Re: $600
THis has the earmarks of powerful people telling him to get lost. He had created a crescendo of chaos that ebbed like a baby's belch. Thank God. It is now for Gohmert to push fascism in the courts. I said Gaetz was the stupidest just in time for Gohmert to reclaim the title. These guys have love Trump for the simple reason that they don't have to think, make sense, or support coherent policies. He is what the doctor ordered for emotion/reason reelections. I doubt Gohmert has supported anything short of a Post Office name that made any sense for the country.
Re: $600
It will get shot down IMO. Perhaps close call, but GOP won’t get on board.
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: $600
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: $600
How lovely it must feel to the GOP Senators, now being on the business end of a tweet that unhinged people might see as a call for violence.
It's important to remember that Trump isn't a conservative and doesn't give a shit about GOP positions on anything (whether the deficit or Iran or whatever else). They're not indulging his temper tantrums (as against Facebook and Twitter, for rightly calling out his bullshit; or as against the Constitution, for its pesky "you got your ass landslid" thing). So he's going to smush their ice cream.
Re: $600
Remind me, again, when the founding fathers said the senate majority leader should wield so much power?
https://twitter.com/teh_snowflake/statu ... 51840?s=21
https://twitter.com/teh_snowflake/statu ... 51840?s=21
Re: $600
He's not wrong. It's wild that a very popular position is: it is bad to give people with income under $75k checks for $2k, but it is fine to give business owners and mid-six-figures-plus executives massive handouts.
Re: $600
I don’t get it!
There’s so many average Mericans who vilify other average Mericans receiving help when they’re out of work, yet remain indifferent to giving away handouts to those who need it the least.
“Poverty exists not because we can’t feed the hungry, but because we can’t satisfy the rich”
There’s so many average Mericans who vilify other average Mericans receiving help when they’re out of work, yet remain indifferent to giving away handouts to those who need it the least.
“Poverty exists not because we can’t feed the hungry, but because we can’t satisfy the rich”
Re: $600
No. People vilify the people who take advantage of the system to receive govt help they dont need.
Much the same way we villify the corporations for taking advantage of the system.
Where do you see it another way? Why do the avg Americans need or deserve more free shit if they are capable of working? No one is defending the corporations (they shouldn't). Put ya Bernie shoes on!
Much the same way we villify the corporations for taking advantage of the system.
Where do you see it another way? Why do the avg Americans need or deserve more free shit if they are capable of working? No one is defending the corporations (they shouldn't). Put ya Bernie shoes on!
Just Ledoux it