Kansas Crimson

Yea.

They aided in obstructing the investigation so they could stick to the defense that there was nothing to investigate.

witnesses?

what witnesses?

one need look no further than the jan. 6 commission and the response from mccarthy and most other pubs...the playbook is the same

they have zero desire to actually get to the bottom of it and uncover the truth

wonder why?

TraditionKU wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:08 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:06 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:58 pm the Ukraine phone call was perfect too.

I don't know what I would call the Ukraine call, but perfect isn't it. Although no clue what that has to do with this thread/topic?

What ever came of all that anyway?

pubs were shown to be spineless sycophants?

You didn't know well before that?

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:57 pm

ousdahl wrote: ↑Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:43 pm Trump’s CFO of the last bajillion years, and the dood officially in charge of running Trump Inc. while homeboy was in public office.

Also some corporations that are part of the Trump brand.

You talk a lot about owners who do/know nothing.....and while often times i disagree, Trump strikes me as someone who might be one that doesn't know a whole hell of a lot about what is going on in the interworkings of his numerous entitites.

While it may actually be the fact of the matter (Trump being an ignorant blowhard) his whole schtick has been that he’s a brilliant hands-on executive who alone can fix problems. Which is it?

Of course the rubes who voted for him don’t know and don’t care to think that far.

Here’s a good point I heard on the radio:

If you were a bank, would you loan to Trump?

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 4:06 pm Here’s a good point I heard on the radio:

If you were a bank, would you loan to Trump?

Nope.

Collateral.
Capacity.
Character.

If you don't check all 3 boxes then it's a no for me dawg.

Exactly. Yet banks made loans. Hmmmm….

Because Randy Jackson wasn't the loan officer.

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 6:12 pm Exactly. Yet banks made loans. Hmmmm….

Banks overlook character far too often.

Or as the Church Lady might say……
“Could it be………Money………Laundering………”

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:46 pm

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 6:12 pm Exactly. Yet banks made loans. Hmmmm….

Banks overlook character far too often.

When you put it that way, how did Trump ever get a loan, ever?

Actually didn’t most banks quit doing bidness with him a while ago?

He could pretty much only get a loan from Douche bank and some shady Ukrainian doods

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 11:28 pm Or as the Church Lady might say……
“Could it be………Money………Laundering………”

ousdahl wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 11:59 pm

BasketballJayhawk wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:46 pm

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 6:12 pm Exactly. Yet banks made loans. Hmmmm….

Banks overlook character far too often.

When you put it that way, how did Trump ever get a loan, ever?

Actually didn’t most banks quit doing bidness with him a while ago?

He could pretty much only get a loan from Douche bank and some shady Ukrainian doods

Yes..but many/most banks probably aren't big enough to take on financing the types of projects he does anyway.

I thought Dyouchabank was the only bank that would lend to him.

zsn wrote: ↑Sat Jul 03, 2021 6:12 pm Exactly. Yet banks made loans. Hmmmm….

In the old days, Trump would just threaten bankruptcy. Rather than take over highly-leveraged properties, banks would extend loans to him. But that was back when Trump was a name banks wanted to be associated with.

Times change.

Wow, this thread started in 2021. He in jail yet?