Draft Watch

Kansas Basketball.
Post Reply
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28886
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Draft Watch

Post by ousdahl »

17. Denver Nuggets: Ochai Agbaji (Kansas, SG/SF, Senior)

Some team figures to see an NBA-ready contributor and value pick in Agbaji. He leads college basketball in points per game in transition while shooting 49.1 percent from three. Even if he offers limited creativity, a playoff team could see him as a useful three-and-D rookie.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/295 ... redictions
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28886
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by ousdahl »

34. Ochai Agbaji, SG, Kansas | Senior
Height: 6' 5" | Weight: 215 | Age: 21
After several seasons on the fringes of the draft, Agbaji looks ready to make the jump, beginning his senior year with a new level of confidence and looking like an improved three-point shooter. While not a flashy player or especially tall for a wing, Agbaji should be able to fill a complementary role in the NBA by continuing to knock down shots and playing reliable defense. He is a solid athlete and looks much more comfortable in all facets this season. It won’t be surprising to see him earn some first-round consideration if he keeps this up.

https://www.si.com/.amp/nba/2021/12/16/ ... t-holmgren
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18985
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by twocoach »

Just don't get drafted by the damn Sacramento Kings or some other shitty franchise and I will be thrilled.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 15118
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Sparko »

I saw he was #7 on one list. Actually mighty versatile scorer right now with high aptitude and great athleticism.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 16020
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by jfish26 »

He’s a good athlete by NBA standards, which is saying something. But he’s not on the Ben/Wiggins level.

My god, if Ben had stayed and learned how to actually play basketball.
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 33081
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by pdub »

I thought Ben was gonna torch the league.
He didnt.
But hes stuck around and can for a bit longer.
Deleted User 863

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Deleted User 863 »

pdub wrote: Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:18 pm I thought Ben was gonna torch the league.
He didnt.
But hes stuck around and can for a bit longer.
Ball handling really held him back.

But he's going to have a 10+ year career when it's all said and done. He's made a lot of money.
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

First ESPN Mock Draft update in quite awhile.

22. Och

34. CB

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/ ... ed-results
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Cascadia »

Someone in the Blazers organization would get shot if they drafted a PG
NDballer13
Posts: 1734
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by NDballer13 »

Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:37 am Someone in the Blazers organization would get shot if they drafted a PG
That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Cascadia »

NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:54 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:37 am Someone in the Blazers organization would get shot if they drafted a PG
That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
Agreed, and someone would get shot.
NDballer13
Posts: 1734
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:08 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by NDballer13 »

Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:58 am
NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:54 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:37 am Someone in the Blazers organization would get shot if they drafted a PG
That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
Agreed, and someone would get shot.
Also wouldn't surprise me if Lillard finally says fuck this and tells them he wants out to play for an actual contender, not a perennial team just good enough to get in the playoffs to lose as a 6-7 seed. He's a good piece, but no team is going to win with CJ McCollum as the #2. First step in keeping Dame is to trade CJ. But as a small market GM/Front Office, how do you justify trading your #2 to build around a guy who has 4, MAYBE 5, years of prime basketball left?
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 16020
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by jfish26 »

NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:09 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:58 am
NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:54 am

That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
Agreed, and someone would get shot.
Also wouldn't surprise me if Lillard finally says fuck this and tells them he wants out to play for an actual contender, not a perennial team just good enough to get in the playoffs to lose as a 6-7 seed. He's a good piece, but no team is going to win with CJ McCollum as the #2. First step in keeping Dame is to trade CJ. But as a small market GM/Front Office, how do you justify trading your #2 to build around a guy who has 4, MAYBE 5, years of prime basketball left?
I was about to respond to your post before this one, and say that "intention" probably isn't the right word. I agree with you here.
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Cascadia »

NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:09 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:58 am
NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:54 am

That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
Agreed, and someone would get shot.
Also wouldn't surprise me if Lillard finally says fuck this and tells them he wants out to play for an actual contender, not a perennial team just good enough to get in the playoffs to lose as a 6-7 seed. He's a good piece, but no team is going to win with CJ McCollum as the #2. First step in keeping Dame is to trade CJ. But as a small market GM/Front Office, how do you justify trading your #2 to build around a guy who has 4, MAYBE 5, years of prime basketball left?
Preaching to the choir here, I've been saying the same thing for years. You can't win in the NBA when your 2nd best player plays the exact same position as your best player. They needed to trade CJ away 2-3 years ago but their front office is a bunch of clowns.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 16020
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by jfish26 »

Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:25 am
NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:09 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:58 am

Agreed, and someone would get shot.
Also wouldn't surprise me if Lillard finally says fuck this and tells them he wants out to play for an actual contender, not a perennial team just good enough to get in the playoffs to lose as a 6-7 seed. He's a good piece, but no team is going to win with CJ McCollum as the #2. First step in keeping Dame is to trade CJ. But as a small market GM/Front Office, how do you justify trading your #2 to build around a guy who has 4, MAYBE 5, years of prime basketball left?
Preaching to the choir here, I've been saying the same thing for years. You can't win in the NBA when your 2nd best player plays the exact same position as your best player. They needed to trade CJ away 2-3 years ago but their front office is a bunch of clowns.
You also can't really win when your second-best player isn't a first-tier Dude, regardless of position, and you don't have a bunch more second-tier Guys.
User avatar
Cascadia
Posts: 6677
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:15 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Cascadia »

jfish26 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:28 am
You also can't really win when your second-best player isn't a first-tier Dude, regardless of position, and you don't have a bunch more second-tier Guys.
I don't completely disagree with this in today's game. But I think Portland could have received a solid return for CJ 2-3 years ago when he was on his 4yr/106M contract and in his mid/late 20's.

Then, with Dame and a solid #2, they could have lured a solid #3 via FA or traded some future picks for the 3rd piece.

They just thought they could pull it off with CJ and Dame. The 2018-2019 season really fucked with their heads.
Deleted User 863

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Deleted User 863 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:25 am First ESPN Mock Draft update in quite awhile.

22. Och

34. CB

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/ ... ed-results
How many international players in 1st round?
User avatar
CrimsonNBlue
Posts: 17405
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 11:30 am

Re: Draft Watch

Post by CrimsonNBlue »

BasketballJayhawk wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:51 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:25 am First ESPN Mock Draft update in quite awhile.

22. Och

34. CB

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/ ... ed-results
How many international players in 1st round?
There's a link.
Deleted User 863

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Deleted User 863 »

Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:58 am
NDballer13 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:54 am
Cascadia wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:37 am Someone in the Blazers organization would get shot if they drafted a PG
That would just tell me they have no intention of keeping Lillard and were starting a rebuild.
Agreed, and someone would get shot.
Ya. Lillard has to leave on his own if he decides to leave.

Fwiw i think I've read in the past that they don't factor in team needs when doing these prior to the lotto being decided.
Deleted User 863

Re: Draft Watch

Post by Deleted User 863 »

CrimsonNBlue wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 10:17 am
BasketballJayhawk wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:51 am
CrimsonNBlue wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 8:25 am First ESPN Mock Draft update in quite awhile.

22. Och

34. CB

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/ ... ed-results
How many international players in 1st round?
There's a link.
I'm not an insider
Post Reply