March Madness 23

Kansas Basketball.
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Back2Lawrence »

Doherty was going to be a victim of the good ole boys club, regardless of what he did. (With almost zero chance of any other outcome).
User avatar
MICHHAWK
Posts: 5420
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:01 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by MICHHAWK »

KANSAS has not made a bad basketball hire in 125 years.
"hey don't blame me, i am going to vote for some random dude"
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 32994
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by pdub »

"Doherty was going to be a victim of the good ole boys club, regardless of what he did. (With almost zero chance of any other outcome)."

I disagree.
UNC was loving their hire that first year.
They just couldn't stand missing the tourney 2 years in a row.

Doherty needed to make the tourney and maybe win the first round -- and then I think he'd have been back with his keeds.

And i'm sure Dean was in roi's ear often after ( and during ) that 2nd year but I don't think he'd ( roi ) have stepped in if Doherty had just gotten back to the tourney.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 15068
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Sparko »

Back2Lawrence wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 11:08 am
randylahey wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 9:01 am
Back2Lawrence wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:56 am

So, KU was out of the blue blood club from 2002-2008.
Ever heard of Danny manning
Of course. Fish made statement its a stretch being a blue blood only having one title in fifty years. My comment simply a response to that. It’s just math based on what he said.

Y’all are funny.
But there was never fifty years between titles Illy.
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Back2Lawrence »

Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15982
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by jfish26 »

Back2Lawrence wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 12:42 pm Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
UCLA won in 1995...which is more or less the same thing as us winning in 1988. It counts...but doesn't do enough to keep you there forever.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 15068
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Sparko »

Back2Lawrence wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 12:42 pm Lol. His post says one in 50 years. Weird he understood the jest in my post and doesn’t feel the need to try to force bad math at me, as you are attempting Cunto.
Bad math? There was 20 years between 88 and 08. And can the ad hominem. You can contort 1952 and years between championships a lot of ways if you want to denigrate fans and the team, but there were a lot of FFs and conference championships there too. And a math whiz would have defined the extreme as 1973-1988. A fan would say we have never gone more than 36-years without a championship throughout the history of organized basketball. But there was the Wilt triple OT game and Glory Road in there at least
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 14386
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by TDub »

here....maybe this will help.

the initial statement was UCLA had 1 title in 50 years

1953 to 2003 is 50 years

how many titles did we have between 1953 and 2003?
Just Ledoux it
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 32994
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by pdub »

UConn SDSU least watched NCAA final ever.
User avatar
TDub
Contributor
Posts: 14386
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 9:32 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by TDub »

shocking no one
Just Ledoux it
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 9128
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.

I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:48 am
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
randylahey
Posts: 7951
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by randylahey »

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:00 am 9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.

I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
Lol my goodness. The things I see you post just blow my mind sometimes
Back2Lawrence
Posts: 1671
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:08 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Back2Lawrence »

TDub wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 12:11 am here....maybe this will help.

the initial statement was UCLA had 1 title in 50 years

1953 to 2003 is 50 years

how many titles did we have between 1953 and 2003?
Thanks tdub. I think.

And Sparko, no one is denigrating any fan or team. But you seem to have a need for that narrative to play out, so have at it.
User avatar
ousdahl
Posts: 28789
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:55 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by ousdahl »

Where’s this year’s UConn fit on all time lists?

20 years from now on the “best teams of the last 20 years” articles, I bet they’re pretty high up, just cuz every tourney win was by like 15+, even tho they weren’t a big deal in the regular season
User avatar
pdub
Site Admin
Posts: 32994
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 10:07 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by pdub »

BWW Chad article.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 15068
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by Sparko »

The math, if we want to call it that was worse between 1923 and 1988. But those end points don't make sense if you are looking at the continuum. We are damned lucky. There was a huge gulf of years for UCLA before Wooden and the 60s.
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 9128
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

randylahey wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:41 am
RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 7:00 am 9.9 million for the ladies on a Sunday afternoon.
14.7 million for the mens on a Monday evening.

I wonder how many people who knew/know who Caitlin Clark is could name a single player on UConn or SDSU and how many people who knew/know who Adama Sanogo is could name a single player on Iowa or LSU.
Call me crazy (I am) but I seriously believe a standout NCAA female Basketball player is more "marketable" TODAY than a standout NCAA Basketball male player is.
The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not but the 2012 and 2016 USA Olympic women's soccer teams say hello.
Lol my goodness. The things I see you post just blow my mind sometimes
Please share with me (and others) what I posted that blew your mind.
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:48 am
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
randylahey
Posts: 7951
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by randylahey »

Women's basketball reaching the popularity of men's basketball
randylahey
Posts: 7951
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: March Madness 23

Post by randylahey »

Thats not sexist either so don't pull that card. The truth of it is men tend to be a lot more interested in men's sports than women are in women sports
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 9128
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: March Madness 23

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

randylahey wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:10 pm Women's basketball reaching the popularity of men's basketball
Once again, my exact words - "The question is will NCAA women's basketball ever reach the popularity of NCAA men's basketball. Probably not".

I guess that's mind blowing to you.
I'm sorry? You're welcome? I'm not sure what to say.
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:48 am
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
Post Reply