Child sex trafficking

Ugh.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

randylahey wrote: Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
The link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.
randylahey
Posts: 7973
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by randylahey »

It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by defixione »

twocoach wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:05 am
randylahey wrote: Sat Aug 05, 2023 6:30 pm Jfish is the dumbass. He begged me in a separate thread to look at his post about Fabian marta. And his info wasn't even accurate. Lol. Dumbass
The link he shared simply said that he was a funder, which is accurate. If you drew some sort of meaning out of it that it was implying that he was the primary funder or a major funder then that's on you for once again failing at reading comprehension. You should stop trying to read into things and just take the words for what they say because your ability to read between the lines and find some deeper inferred meaning is terrible.
Felony kidnapping is no big deal to them.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

randylahey wrote: Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:55 pm It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news
A felony kidnapping case, whether related to child custody or not, is not a non story if you care about children like you claim.
Sparko
Contributor
Posts: 15091
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:01 pm

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by Sparko »

But they don't care. See Trump's family "separation"
RainbowsandUnicorns
Contributor
Posts: 9170
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2021 8:19 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by RainbowsandUnicorns »

Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.

Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
MICHHAWK wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 10:48 am
your posting history on this this site alone. says you should not be calling other people stupid.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

RainbowsandUnicorns wrote: Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:26 am Thanks fish and 2coach! I was thinking similar thoughts and admit I was sort of baiting randy.
I felt to a LESSER extent fish MAYBE did something randy often does and randy the "dumbass" (his word - not mine) was too stupid to realize calling out fish for it makes him an even bigger hypocrite.

Then randy went on to say - "It was a child custody dispute. It was a non story, but a bunch of libs all butthurt about a movie the left media told them not to like, turned it into fake news".
Which of course proves randy is a bigger "dumbass" (his word - not mine) than he was before he made that post.
Thanks to defix, 2coach, and Sparko for helping point that out.
We're in this weird social media cycle where pointing anything out is "making a big deal of it" or "being in your head". A Chiefs fan posts something that mentions the Bengals and Bengals fans spazz out about it being proof that the Bengals are all Chiefs fans think about. Someone rightly points out that a person who was a funder of a movie was arrested for a charge and it's "someone making a huge deal of it trying to sabotage the movie". People are so in their social media echo chambers of arguing and ignorance that everything is taken to the nth degree without hesitation. It's exhausting to be honest.
User avatar
KUTradition
Contributor
Posts: 10956
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 8:53 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by KUTradition »

shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued

shocked, i tell you
Have we fallen into a mesmerized state that makes us accept as inevitable that which is inferior or detrimental, as though having lost the will or the vision to demand that which is good?
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by defixione »

Good news rarely draws any attention.
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

KUTradition wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 10:02 am shocked that our resident child safety advocate hasn’t posted the recent news of the trafficking bust and children being rescued

shocked, i tell you
Yep, just another case of "Biden's" FBI that doesn't do anything about child sex trafficking doing something about child sex trafficking.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/08/australi ... index.html

Our local Omaha FBI field office played a major part in one of these busts last year. Thank goodness they actually care about busting sex traffickers unlike Randy's version of them.

https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-of ... -operation
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

Another recent case here in Omaha, this one the sentencing of a former Omaha police officer who was arrested for production and possession of child pornography to 36 years in federal prison.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ne/pr/form ... sion-child
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15995
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by jfish26 »

But see there’s this movie.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15995
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by jfish26 »

Good!

(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
User avatar
defixione
Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by defixione »

Why is the deep state working in Australia instead of the USA?
randylahey
Posts: 7973
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:13 pm

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by randylahey »

jfish26 wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pm
Good!

(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
These are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issue
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15995
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by jfish26 »

randylahey wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:38 pm
jfish26 wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 1:24 pm
Good!

(But this doesn't get at the issue you assiduously avoid, which is that (1) whether or not child sex trafficking is bad (it is!) is simply not the same thing as (2) where this movie came from, and why, and from whom, and what the movie is being used for.)
These are issues you created. My whole point was that it's bad. You're the one trying to argue semantics about a movie that highlights a bad issue
I created nothing. The very first time this stupid movie was mentioned on this board was you complaining about liberals taking a skeptical eye toward the movie.

In fact, the ONLY reason this thread exists is you (later) tried to move the goalposts.
User avatar
Shirley
Contributor
Posts: 14071
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 11:29 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by Shirley »

“We are living through a revolt against the future. The future will prevail.”
Anand Giridharadas
User avatar
twocoach
Posts: 18950
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:33 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by twocoach »

Yes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.

No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.
jfish26
Contributor
Posts: 15995
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:41 am

Re: Child sex trafficking

Post by jfish26 »

twocoach wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:06 pm
Yes, that is the case I linked the story to above and that others were referencing.

No one here is doubting that there are various child pedophilia rings operating all over the world. There are no people here or anywhere else claiming otherwise. Good grief. It's the next phase of "logic" that jumps to the conspiracy theory level of stupidity.
More specifically, using the stupid movie as a form of loyalty test; if you DON'T support this stupid movie, that makes you PRO CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING.
Post Reply