How was that available.
Dumbfuck in charge
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
The answer is right there in the link. Such a looser.
It’s in this thread title too!
It’s in this thread title too!
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
That article was quite the eye opener. It really highlights the grip that Trump has over the Republican Party. And the threat of another Trump run in 2024 is going to continue to divide the party for the next four years.jfish26 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 6:31 am Dumbfuck indeed.
https://twitter.com/noahcrothman/status ... 57793?s=21
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Trump was epically terrible and inept; enabled by folks in the GOP who were not sanctioned by voters for enabling mayhem, death and destruction. That Fox alternative universe must be dismantled. We can't survive this kind of corrupt lunacy much longer.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
What a looney. Some turkey day briefing he gave today...
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
I hope we didn't do this
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middleea ... index.html
Iran's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahavadi, was killed on Friday near Tehran, state media has reported.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middleea ... index.html
Iran's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahavadi, was killed on Friday near Tehran, state media has reported.
Defense. Rebounds.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
I assume "we" did play a role in it.jhawks99 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:09 am I hope we didn't do this
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/27/middleea ... index.html
Iran's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahavadi, was killed on Friday near Tehran, state media has reported.
You don't think Donny is in bed with Benny?
Gee, anyone think the timing is just a coincidence? I think not.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/israel-pr ... ran-report
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Big massive dumps
lulz
lulz
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Lulz
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 44964?s=21
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 32770?s=21
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 44964?s=21
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/sta ... 32770?s=21
"The real issue with covid: its not killing enough people." - randylahey
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
GTS Champ 2008
GTS Champ 2020*
“We good?” - Bill Self
RIP jhawk73
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
His enfeebled brain is simply incapable of grasping defeat. It is shameful that mainline Republicans (Blunt, for example) continue to give this nonsense oxygen.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Funny how his feeble mind and Russian disinformation campaigns always align.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/funny
Some of #3, some of #5.adjective, fun·ni·er, fun·ni·est.
1. providing fun; causing amusement or laughter; amusing; comical:
a funny remark; a funny person.
2. attempting to amuse; facetious:
Did you really mean that or were you just being funny?
3. warranting suspicion; deceitful; underhanded:
We thought there was something funny about those extra charges.
4. Informal. insolent; impertinent:
Don't get funny with me, young man!
5. curious; strange; peculiar; odd:
Her speech has a funny twang.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Not #2 for sure. Strikes me as a Goodfellas rant with Trump.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Neither 1 nor 2 apply to anything Trump has ever said, done or thought. He is a startlingly unfunny (#1 and #2) man.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Put this in perspective. OUR President is re-tweeting supportive things from "catturd".
This being one of them.
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333471011124162562
The same "catturd" who tweets gems such as.....
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333780461353635847
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333554434492796928
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333418561210093573
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1332415859722170368
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1330954604037681153
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1330238682046099460
This being one of them.
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333471011124162562
The same "catturd" who tweets gems such as.....
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333780461353635847
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333554434492796928
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1333418561210093573
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1332415859722170368
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1330954604037681153
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1330238682046099460
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
Rudy has put forward "evidence" of nothing of substance. Because there is nothing of substance. There is no there there.
Don't you think that, if the campaign could identify any actual voter fraud - even something isolated and insignificant to any outcome - they'd be blowing that into the biggest and most widespread controversy of all time?
They're not doing that, because they don't even have that.
It's fucking toddler games: I have all of the evidence, boy do I, but since you're so corrupt I won't even show it to you!
My ten year old would see through this. Maybe my two year old.
Don't you think that, if the campaign could identify any actual voter fraud - even something isolated and insignificant to any outcome - they'd be blowing that into the biggest and most widespread controversy of all time?
They're not doing that, because they don't even have that.
It's fucking toddler games: I have all of the evidence, boy do I, but since you're so corrupt I won't even show it to you!
My ten year old would see through this. Maybe my two year old.
Re: Dumbfuck in charge
your kids have better reasoning skills than so many adults in this country, as evidenced by the rubes that’s continue to send the criminals moneyjfish26 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:01 am Rudy has put forward "evidence" of nothing of substance. Because there is nothing of substance. There is no there there.
Don't you think that, if the campaign could identify any actual voter fraud - even something isolated and insignificant to any outcome - they'd be blowing that into the biggest and most widespread controversy of all time?
They're not doing that, because they don't even have that.
It's fucking toddler games: I have all of the evidence, boy do I, but since you're so corrupt I won't even show it to you!
My ten year old would see through this. Maybe my two year old.