2022-2023 Bracketology

[jfish26]

Dang.

Ucla beat us in 07
Stanford beat us in 14
Oregon beat us in 17
USC slaughtered us in 21
Am I forgetting one?

Of course, I don’t wanna be a roiboi about it. But it’s quite the anomaly in Self’s otherwise dominant career

Eh, Bill has 16 tournament losses in 20 years. I don’t think a concentration of four of the losses to one conference is all that surprising.

[NewtonHawk11]

https://twitter.com/espnlunardi/status/ ... eTAW6ELYeg

[MICHHAWK]

joe lunardi is the best in the game. the jay bilas of bracketologists.

4 BIG 12 teams in his top 8. 5 if you count houston.

[Deleted User 863]

Dang.

Ucla beat us in 07
Stanford beat us in 14
Oregon beat us in 17
USC slaughtered us in 21
Am I forgetting one?

Of course, I don’t wanna be a roiboi about it. But it’s quite the anomaly in Self’s otherwise dominant career

Eh, Bill has 16 tournament losses in 20 years. I don’t think a concentration of four of the losses to one conference is all that surprising.

This.


I am not scared of the pac12 any more than the big10 or ACC. Less probably if we are being honest.

[MICHHAWK]

By BIG 12 standards. the big 10 is awful this year. the acc is awful this year. the pac 10 is awful this year.

[surly]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

[jfish26]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

[MICHHAWK]

i think the BIG 12 is more likely to have 5 or 6 teams in the sweet 16. and 3 or 4 teams in the elite 8. than they are to flameout in the first weekend.

[pdub]

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

damn

[NewtonHawk11]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

Dammmmmmmmmmmmmmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

[pdub]

over the last 10 years his son could count the number of times his team finished high enough in the B12 standings to where he could count to.

[twocoach]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

NET rankings of the bottom 5 teams in the Big 12: 23, 27, 47, 50, 65

NET rankings of bottom 7 teams in the Big 10: 41, 55, 60, 64, 74, 94, 239

Go sell that nonsense somewhere else.

[surly]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

of course, that's not what i wrote.

[thekid6]

Usually I capitalize the word "I" in a sentence.

[jfish26]

I'm guessing the B12 will have several misfires in the tournament, early flame outs. The top half may be better than the B10's, IDK, but the bottom half isn't.

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

of course, that's not what i wrote.

What you wrote is quoted, right there above.

[digitalkookie]

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

of course, that's not what i wrote.

What you wrote is quoted, right there above.

C'mon Fish, let's not let a silly thing like facts get in the way here

[surly]

The "bottom half" of the Big 12 is absolutely not weaker than the "bottom half" of the B1G.

But, I'll grant that you might have a lot more historical understanding of the bottom half of the Big 12 than anyone else here.

of course, that's not what i wrote.

What you wrote is quoted, right there above.

correct. you obviously didn't major in english.

[TDub]

He said the bottom half of the big xii is not better than the bottom half of the big 10....he didn't say they were weaker

duh...I mean, just think of all the options in between better and worse.........

wait....

[pdub]

I think...and if so it's not written that well...tmcats is saying the top half of the B12 is better than the Big 10's top half but the B12's bottom half is NOT better than the B10's top half.

[jfish26]

of course, that's not what i wrote.

What you wrote is quoted, right there above.

correct. you obviously didn't major in english.

Ok, E.E. Cummings.